Relativistic Doppler Shift and a Star breaking up

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
68 replies · 9K views
Yes. That's the one you want.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So for Remnant A, the equation is:

[tex](4.282*10^{14}) = (6.690*10^{14}) \gamma [1 - \beta cos \theta][/tex]

And for remnant B:

[tex](7.135*10^{14}) = (6.690*10^{14}) \gamma [1 + \beta cos (\theta)][/tex]

TFM
 
Good. Now combine and solve for [itex]\cos\theta[/itex] and [itex]\beta[/itex].
 
I've canceled them down to:

Remnant A:

[tex]\beta cos(\theta) = 1 - 0.648\gamma[/tex]

Remnant B:

[tex]\beta cos (\theta) = 1.0665 \gamma - 1[/tex]

Does this look right?

TFM
 
There are many ways to combine these equations. (I didn't check your arithmetic.)

However, there seems to be a problem with the data. There doesn't seem to be a solution for the given numbers. Unless I'm making an error, I'd say there's a mistake in the supplied data.
 
to find beta would you do:

[tex]\beta = \frac{1 - 0.648\gamma}{cos\theta}[/tex]

and

[tex]\beta = \frac{1.0665 \gamma - 1}{cos \theta}[/tex]

and equate to get:

[tex]\frac{1 - 0.648\gamma}{cos\theta} = \beta = \frac{1.0665 \gamma - 1}{cos \theta}[/tex]

Also, what seems to be the problem with the data?

TFM
 
Don't forget to express [itex]\gamma[/itex] in terms of [itex]\beta[/itex].
TFM said:
Also, what seems to be the problem with the data?
Solve for [itex]\beta[/itex] and see.
 
How am I going so far:

[tex]\frac{1 - 0.648\gamma}{cos\theta} = \frac{1.0665 \gamma - 1}{cos \theta}[/tex]

Times both sides by cos theta

[tex]1 - 0.648\gamma = 1.0665 \gamma - 1[/tex]

Put Gamma in:

[tex]1 - \frac{0.0648}{\sqrt{1 - \beta^2}} = \frac{1.0665}{\sqrt{1 - \beta^2}} - 1[/tex]

[tex]2 - \frac{0.0648}{\sqrt{1 - \beta^2}} = \frac{1.0665}{\sqrt{1 - \beta^2}}[/tex]

rearrange:

[tex]2 = \frac{1.0665}{\sqrt{1 - \beta^2}} + \frac{0.0648}{\sqrt{1 - \beta^2}}[/tex]

How does this look?

TFM
 
[tex]2 = \frac{1.0665}{\sqrt{1 - \beta^2}} + \frac{0.0648}{\sqrt{1 - \beta^2}}[/tex]

Which goes to

[tex]2 = \frac{1.1313}{\sqrt{1 - \beta^2}}[/tex]

Does this look okay so far?

TFM
 
TFM said:
I've canceled them down to:

Remnant A:

[tex]\beta cos(\theta) = 1 - 0.648\gamma[/tex]

Remnant B:

[tex]\beta cos (\theta) = 1.0665 \gamma - 1[/tex]

Does this look right?

TFM
Redo these. I don't see how you got these from the equations in post #32.
 
Remnant A:

[tex]4.282*10^{14} = (6.690*10^{14})\gamma(1-\beta cos\theta)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{ 4.282*10^{14}}{(6.690*10^{14})\gamma} = 1 - \beta cos\theta[/tex]

[tex]\frac{ 4.282*10^{14}}{(6.690*10^{14})\gamma} - 1 = -\beta cos\theta[/tex]

[tex]-(\frac{ 4.282*10^{14}}{(6.690*10^{14})\gamma} - 1)/ \beta = cos\theta[/tex]

Remnant B:

[tex]7.135*10^{14} = (6.690*10^{14})\gamma(1+\beta cos\theta)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{7.135*10^{14}}{(6.690*10^{14})\gamma} = 1+\beta cos\theta[/tex]

[tex]\frac{7.135*10^{14}}{(6.690*10^{14})\gamma} - 1 = \beta cos\theta[/tex]

([tex]\frac{7.135*10^{14}}{(6.690*10^{14})\gamma} - 1)/ \beta = cos\theta[/tex]

So:

([tex]\frac{7.135*10^{14}}{(6.690*10^{14})\gamma} - 1)/ \beta = -(\frac{ 4.282*10^{14}}{(6.690*10^{14})\gamma} - 1)/ \beta[/tex]

How does this look so far?

TFM
 
It looks OK to me, so long as you realize that [itex]\gamma[/itex] is a function of [itex]\beta[/itex].
 
So

[tex]\frac{7.135*10^{14}}{(6.690*10^{14})\gamma} - 1)/ \beta = -(\frac{ 4.282*10^{14}}{(6.690*10^{14})\gamma} - 1)/ \beta[/tex]

This is the same as:

[tex]\beta( \frac{7.135*10^{14}}{(6.690*10^{14})\gamma} - 1)) = -\beta(\frac{ 4.282*10^{14}}{(6.690*10^{14})\gamma} - 1)[/tex]

And

[tex]\gamma = \frac{1}{1-\beta^2}[/tex]

So

[tex]\beta( \frac{7.135*10^{14}}{(6.690*10^{14})(\frac{1}{1-\beta^2})} - 1)) = -\beta(\frac{ 4.282*10^{14}}{(6.690*10^{14})(\frac{1}{1-\beta^2})} - 1)[/tex]

TFM
 
Thus goes to:

[tex]\beta( \frac{7.135*10^{14}}{((\frac{6.690*10^{14}}{1-\beta^2})} - 1)) = -\beta(\frac{ 4.282*10^{14}}{)(\frac{6.690*10^{14}}{1-\beta^2})} - 1)[/tex]

Edit sorry, brackets slightly weong:

[tex]\beta( \frac{7.135*10^{14}}{(\frac{6.690*10^{14}}{1-\beta^2})} - 1)) = -\beta(\frac{ 4.282*10^{14}}{(\frac{6.690*10^{14}}{1-\beta^2})} - 1)[/tex]


Okay so far?

TFM
 
Looks OK, but please simplify. To start, you can:
(1) Cancel the [itex]\beta[/itex]s on the outside.
(2) Cancel the exponents.
 
So, cancels:

[tex]\frac{7.135}{(\frac{6.690}{1-\beta^2})} - 1 = -\beta(\frac{ 4.282}{(\frac{6.690}{1-\beta^2})} - 1)[/tex]

Look Okay?

Edit: missed a beta, sorry

[tex]\frac{7.135}{(\frac{6.690}{1-\beta^2})} - 1 = -\frac{ 4.282}{(\frac{6.690}{1-\beta^2})} - 1[/tex]

TFM
 
TFM said:
[tex]\frac{7.135}{(\frac{6.690}{1-\beta^2})} - 1 = -\frac{ 4.282}{(\frac{6.690}{1-\beta^2})} - 1[/tex]
Check signs on the right hand side.
 
Where is the wrongsign, because it seems to still kepp with:

[tex]\frac{7.135*10^{14}}{(6.690*10^{14})\gamma} - 1)/ \beta = -(\frac{ 4.282*10^{14}}{(6.690*10^{14})\gamma} - 1)/ \beta[/tex]

?

TFM
 
[tex]\frac{7.135}{(\frac{6.690}{1-\beta^2})} - 1 = -\frac{ 4.282}{(\frac{6.690}{1-\beta^2})} + 1[/tex]

Is this correct?

TFM
 
So now:

[tex]\frac{7.135}{(\frac{6.690}{1-\beta^2})} = -\frac{ 4.282}{(\frac{6.690}{1-\beta^2})} + 2[/tex]

And:

[tex]((1-\beta^2) \frac{7.135}{6.690})}) = -((1-\beta^2)(\frac{ 4.282}{6.690}) + 2[/tex]

Does this look okay?

TFM
 
Sure. But let's not go through each step. Take it home. Isolate [itex](1 - \beta^2)[/itex], then solve for [itex]\beta[/itex]. (Show each step, but don't wait for confirmation before continuing.)
 
Rght, so

[tex]((1-\beta^2) \frac{7.135}{6.690})}) + ((1-\beta^2)(\frac{ 4.282}{6.690}) = 2[/tex]

Putting the 1 + beta squared on top:

[tex]\frac{7.135(1-\beta^2)}{6.690})} + \frac{(1-\beta^2)4.282}{6.690} = 2[/tex]

Add together:

[tex]\frac{7.135(1-\beta^2) + (1-\beta^2)4.282}{6.690})} = 2[/tex]

Times by 6.690

[tex]7.135(1-\beta^2) + (1-\beta^2)4.282 = 2*6.69[/tex]

[tex]11.417(1-\beta^2) = 13.38[/tex]

So

[tex]1-\beta^2 = 13.38/11.417[/tex]

[tex]1-\beta^2 = 1.172[/tex]

[tex]1 = 1.172 + \beta^2[/tex]

[tex]\beta^2 = 1-1.172[/tex]

[tex]\beta^2 = -0.17[/tex]

I have I done something wrong? you cannot square root a negative number?

TFM
 
TFM said:
I have I done something wrong? you cannot square root a negative number?
Remember what I said (in post #35) about there being something wrong with the data? That's what I'm talking about.
 
Would the best thing to do in this case be remove the minus sign, and then indicate on my work I have done so and the reason why?

TFM
 
TFM said:
Would the best thing to do in this case be remove the minus sign, and then indicate on my work I have done so and the reason why?
What would be the reason why?

I would present your work clearly (and concisely) and show that it leads to impossible results, which indicates that the problem is flawed. (If your instructor thinks the problem is OK, then I'd like to see his solution.)
 
Well, the question is worth ten marks, so I thought just make it a magnitude (by squaring then square rooting the negative number) , so that you can still get a answer, but if you think it would be better to leave it as it is, I will do so.

Thanks,

TFM
 
Hey,

I was reading this thread and spotted this,

TFM said:
So


[tex]\gamma = \frac{1}{1-\beta^2}[/tex]


TFM

I've probably missed something but shouldn't this be,

[tex]\gamma^{2}=\frac{1}{1-\beta^{2}}[/tex]

or

[tex]\gamma = \sqrt{\frac{1}{1-\beta^2}}[/tex]
 
Vuldoraq said:
Hey,

I was reading this thread and spotted this,



I've probably missed something but shouldn't this be,

[tex]\gamma^{2}=\frac{1}{1-\beta^{2}}[/tex]

or

[tex]\gamma = \sqrt{\frac{1}{1-\beta^2}}[/tex]
Absolutely. Good catch!