B Relativistic Kinetic Energy: Does Mass Change?

Weam Abou Hamdan
Messages
25
Reaction score
3
Hello,

According to Special Relativity, the mass of an object must increase as its speed approaches the speed of light.
m=m0γ
In the formula that allows us to calculate the kinetic energy of a body, KE=0.5mv2, should we take into consideration such increase in mass?

Weam Abou Hamdan
Wednesday, August 22, 2018
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Weam Abou Hamdan said:
Hello,

According to Special Relativity, the mass of an object must increase as its speed approaches the speed of light.
m=m0γ
In the formula that allows us to calculate the kinetic energy of a body, KE=0.5mv2, should we take into consideration such increase in mass?
That ##mv^2/2## formula for the kinetic energy is a classical approximation that only works at speeds that are small compared the speed of light. The correct relativistic expression for the kinetic energy is ##(\gamma-1)m_0c^2## where ##\gamma=1/\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}## and ##m_0## is the mass of the object when it is at rest. (It would be a good exercise to confirm that this expression approaches ##mv^2/2## when ##v## is small compared with ##c## - expanding ##\gamma## in a power series in ##v/c## will do the trick).

Although you'll hear that bit about the mass of an object increasing a lot, this idea has been largely abandoned in recent decades - there are better ways of describing what happens. This comes up so often that we have an Insights article: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-is-relativistic-mass-and-why-it-is-not-used-much/
 
Weam Abou Hamdan said:
According to Special Relativity, the mass of an object must increase as its speed approaches the speed of light.
Even as early as Einstein the concept of relativistic mass has been recommended against. Here is a good paper on the topic:

https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0504110
 
  • Like
Likes PAllen, Demystifier and Sorcerer
Weam Abou Hamdan said:
Hello,

According to Special Relativity, the mass of an object must increase as its speed approaches the speed of light.
m=m0γ
In the formula that allows us to calculate the kinetic energy of a body, KE=0.5mv2, should we take into consideration such increase in mass?

Weam Abou Hamdan
Wednesday, August 22, 2018
Please stop thinking about relativistic mass. Instead, find out what proper time is, and use the quantity t/γ as time and do the normal kinematic derivation of kinetic energy. The γ will end up giving you the relativistic kinetic energy formula.

Using t/γ as time:

Divide x by t/γ
Miltiply by m to get relativistic momentum
Take the derivative with respect to t to get force
Integrate over distance (changing the variable to v) to get relativistic kinetic energy.

Basically the same thing you’d do in non-relativistic physics but starting with t/γ instead of t.This old post by a site mentor goes through it more concisely:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/derivation-of-relativistic-energy.63380/#post-458653
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top