- #1
Zacarias Nason
- 67
- 4
Hey, folks. I, on a whim today, started taking a MOOC quantum mechanics course that I have the functional math skills necessary to do but have virtually no background knowledge of quantum to start with and am incredibly rusty on stuff like PDE's; Quite frankly I'm out of my league, but the course just started and I'm going to work my butt off to do as well as I can and at least pass. The first lecture of the course is discussing the time-dependent Schrodinger Equation for a single, nonrelativistic particle:
i \hbar \frac{\partial \psi(x,t)}{\partial t} = \bigg( - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + v(x,t) \bigg) \psi (x,t)
And he makes it clear that it's obvious that we can tell that this is the nonrelativistic version because of the kinetic energy operator is p^2/2m. But I don't see p^2/2m, I see what is a kinetic energy operator, \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}, but that isn't equivalent to p^2/2m, is it? I'm guessing based on poking around Wikipedia that this has to do with the Hamiltonian/Lagrangian, of which I think I only ever messed with Hamiltonians in Analytical Mechanics, a little bit. How do I understand the jump from one representation to another?
i \hbar \frac{\partial \psi(x,t)}{\partial t} = \bigg( - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + v(x,t) \bigg) \psi (x,t)
And he makes it clear that it's obvious that we can tell that this is the nonrelativistic version because of the kinetic energy operator is p^2/2m. But I don't see p^2/2m, I see what is a kinetic energy operator, \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}, but that isn't equivalent to p^2/2m, is it? I'm guessing based on poking around Wikipedia that this has to do with the Hamiltonian/Lagrangian, of which I think I only ever messed with Hamiltonians in Analytical Mechanics, a little bit. How do I understand the jump from one representation to another?
