Relativists please answer this scnerio

  • Thread starter Thread starter nehemiah
  • Start date Start date
nehemiah
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Here is a scenario...two places A & B

A--------- 7.5 LM distance (1349066061 KM) -----------------B

Build a wall @ B, A person starts high speed and he stops @ B as soon as he hit.
Person A starts @ 10:00 am and he travels @ .75C speed
So according to A he took 6.61443 mins to cover distance of A--->B

According to observer A took 10 mins to reach B
According to the observer the velocity was distance/time = 7.5LM/10M = .75C which matches the reality

Immediately after the journey this question was thrown to the driver, "Sir may we know the speed of your Jet?"
Person A calculates and says "well I covered 1349066061km in 6.61443 mins, So I guess my velocity was 1.1333C...

However according to Einstein’s theory nothing can cross Speed of light, but that driver claims he traveled @ 1.13C speed...Sot the driver's calculation is wrong, because his clock got malfunctioned.

Note:
Nehemiah is a strong opposing energy against time dilation, And he strongly believes people who says time dilates they forgot to blame the clock but time.

Nehemiah's few strong points against time dilation are as follows, "All clocks in the world are somewhere inefficient"

1. Water based hourglass doesn't work well due to low temperature ( ~viscosity differs)

2. A sand based hourglass, doesn't work well when we go out of Earth due to low gravity.

3. A bacterial clock doesn't well if it is kept inside a refrigerator. (Bacterial clock means a clock which shows time by measuring the # of bacteria inside a bottle based on the speed of reproduction) If you have two bacterial clock and keep one inside fridge and another outside fridge;Of course the clock inside fridge will run slowly...If a person says "when temperature gets down then time dilates, and when temperature reaches 0"Celcius time stops", he must be obviously a moron"

4. Atomic clock doesn't function well in case of high velocity...

So all the above mentioned clocks are subject to malfunctioning due to variance of viscosity, gravity, velocity & temperature.

Yet Nehemiah never understood why relativists keep saying time dilates. How can time dilate, Its none other that your clock runs slow...not the time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the atomic clock is the time measurer and the one u said that the atomic clock run slower at high velocity that phenomina is only time dialition.
 
bapul4u said:
the atomic clock is the time measurer and the one u said that the atomic clock run slower at high velocity that phenomina is only time dialition.

NO...Atomic clock is NOT the perfect time measure...What made us to think like that? Can't atomic clock fail and better technology come tomorrow?...In fact I have better clock than atomic clock which is not affected by high velocity... :)
 
Nehemiah needs to read the thread labeled "IMPORTANT! Read before posting" at the top of this page.

Nehemiah needs to follow those guidelines to post here.

It would help Nehemiah if he were to stop referring to himself in the third person. Nehemiah might think that it gives Nehemiah's posts some gravitas, but it is more likely to invoke other instances like "Mongo only pawn in game of life".
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top