Relativity : Muons traveling Qns

  • Thread starter Thread starter Delzac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Muons Relativity
AI Thread Summary
Muons traveling at 0.9994c in a 500m radius storage ring are expected to make approximately 6.06 trips before decaying, based on an observed decay time of 2.2 microseconds. In the muon's frame of reference, due to length contraction, they perceive having traveled only about 0.21 trips. There are no contradictions in the calculations, as time dilation allows the muons to cover more distance than it appears from an external observer's perspective. The explanation clarifies that while the decay time is shorter in the muon's frame, the relativistic effects lead to a greater perceived distance traveled. Overall, the calculations and reasoning regarding relativistic effects are accurate and clear.
Delzac
Messages
389
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Muons move in circular orbits at a speed of 0.9994c in a storage ring which has a radius of 500m. How many trips around the storage ring do we expect the muons to make before they decay? How many trips around the storage ring do the muons think they have made? Are there any contradictions?
[ The question didn't give the by what time will muons decay, so i did a little search and took 2.2*10^-6 sec as the time before the decay.)

Homework Equations


L = L_0/\gamma
\Delta T = \gamma \Delta T_0

The Attempt at a Solution



(i) v = 0.9994c, r=500m, C=2*pi*500=1000*pi, \Delta T_0 = 2.2*10^-6

Therefore using \Delta T = \gamma \Delta T_0,
\Delta T = 6.35*10^-5
Distance moved = (0.9994)(3.0*10^8)(6.35*10^-5)=19,038.57m
Trips around storage ring = 19,038.57/1000pi = 6.06 times.

(ii)
Distance moved in the frame of muons = 0.9994c*2.2*10^-6 = 659.604
Trips around the ring as in frame of muons = 659.604/1000pi = 0.20996

(iii)
There are not contradiction since in the frame of muon, the ring or the distance traveled by it has been length contracted. Therefore, the muon actually traveled more than it seem to have traveled.

In the frame of an observer however the muon although should decay in 2.2micro seconds didn't due to time dilation. Thus with this apparent increase in time, the muon can cover more distance and hence have more trips around the rings.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Can anyone check my answer for part i ii and iii. I believe i got i and ii correct. But most importantly is my explanation in iii in anyway wrong or unclear or lacking?

Any help will be greatly appreciated
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ermm...any help?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top