(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Relativity -- problem of simultaneity

I wrote a basic outline of relativity on my blog. I think I got it right, as far as it goes:

wp.me/p2ukOd-D

--As I understand it, relativity says there is no *preferred* sequencing of events. Two events can be considered to be simultaneous, or one can be considered to happen before the other, or vice versa, depending on your frame of reference.

The more I thought about this, the more I wondered:

Can't the time distance between the event and the beginning of the Universe be measured objectively? Does that not make room for a notionally objective observational frame of reference, albeit one no human observer could occupy?

Or have I just misunderstood the implications of the theory of relativity?

Conrad.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Relativity - problem of simultaneity

Loading...

Similar Threads - Relativity problem simultaneity | Date |
---|---|

Problem Perceiving Simultaneity (Special Relativity) | May 21, 2015 |

Relativity Of Simultaneity Problem | Feb 3, 2014 |

Can anyone show me some maths to explain the train problem with relative simultaneity | Jun 17, 2012 |

Simultaneity in General Relativity and Problem with coordinate systems concepts. | Mar 27, 2011 |

Problem with relativity of simultaneity original example | Feb 5, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**