(Relativity) Space Time Interval

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of frame S' relative to frame S using the events A and B in spacetime. Participants emphasize the need for Lorentz transformations to accurately relate the coordinates of these events between the two frames, as simple velocity calculations may lead to incorrect conclusions about the speed of light. There is confusion about the interpretation of event coordinates and the implications of simultaneity in different frames. The importance of drawing a spacetime diagram is highlighted to visualize the relationships between the events and the frames. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the homework problems effectively.
ak345
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Frames S and S' are moving relative to each other along the x and x' axes. They set their clocks to
t = t'=0 when their origins coincide. In frame S, Event A occurs at xA = 1 yr and tA = 1 yr, while event B occurs at xB = 2 yr and tB = 0.5 yr. These events occur simultaneously in S'.
(a) Find the magnitude and direction of the velocity of S' relative to S.
(b) Draw a spacetime diagram to confirm part (a).
(c) At what time do both events occur as measured in S'?
(d) At what locations do the events occur as measured in S'?

Homework Equations



I believe V=x/t can be used
Also, slope=1/v


The Attempt at a Solution



Using those two equations, the velocity for A is 1 and the velocity for B is 4
I don't know how those relate to S and S'. Also, isn't the slope of C=1? So B is going faster than the speed of light? Thats doesn't seem right
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A and B are events in space-time. There is no movement of A and B. Only S and S' are moving.
Your relevant equations should not be slope (of what?) = 1/v and V = x/t (that looks as if you think A was in the origins when S and S' set their clocks and has moved to x in frame S in one year of S time). I shudder to think what your idea about the velocity of B could possibly be.

XA=1 yr is also very strange. Do you mean xA/c = 1 yr ?

You treat C as another event, but the speed of light, c is what it says it is: a speed.

Your relevant equations should have something to do with Lorentz transformations. And I suppose you know about them...
If not, you have to read up, because some relativity is needed for this excercise...

Oh, and: Hello Ak, and welcome to PF !
 
Last edited:
ak345 said:

Homework Statement



Frames S and S' are moving relative to each other along the x and x' axes. They set their clocks to
t = t'=0 when their origins coincide. In frame S, Event A occurs at xA/c = 1 yr and tA = 1 yr, while event B occurs at xB/c = 2 yr and tB = 0.5 yr. These events occur simultaneously in S'.
(a) Find the magnitude and direction of the velocity of S' relative to S.
(b) Draw a spacetime diagram to confirm part (a).
(c) At what time do both events occur as measured in S'?
(d) At what locations do the events occur as measured in S'?

Homework Equations



gamma=1/(sqrt(1-beta^2))

The Attempt at a Solution



I am having a really tough time figuring out what this looks like. These events start in S and end up in S'. S is our fixed frame and S' is our moving frame. How do I calculate the velocity of S'? Do both events end up in S'
The events exist independently of S or S'. When you say ##x_A/c = 1\text{ yr}## and ##t_A = 1\text{ yr}##, you're choosing to orient your coordinate system such that those statements are true in frame S.

The Lorentz transformations allow you to calculate the coordinates of an event in a different frame if you know the relative velocity of the two reference frames. This is analogous to finding the coordinates of a point in a rotated system. By this I mean, suppose there's a point that has coordinates (x,y) in your original system, and now you rotate the axes by an angle ##\theta## and you want to find the coordinates of the point (x',y') with respect to the new axes. As you hopefully learned in the past, you simply calculate
\begin{eqnarray*}
x' = x \cos\theta - y\sin\theta \\
y' = x \sin\theta + y\cos\theta
\end{eqnarray*} These equations simply relate the old coordinates (x,y) of a point to the new ones (x',y') given the angle ##\theta##. The Lorentz transformations similarly relate space-time coordinates (t,x) of an event in S to the space-time coordinates (t',x') of the event in S'.

It might help you to think about part (b) first. Have you drawn a spacetime diagram for the events in S? What do the x' and t' axes look like on that diagram?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top