Relativity, the flow of time and speed

atymtrvlr
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Question:

According to Einstein an object traveling at relativistic speeds would not experience the passage of time (time stands still).

Speaking from the vantage point of the relativistic object:

Let's consider a photon. At 1C time stands still for the photon (T=0).

1. With the absence of time, isn’t the relative velocity of the photon actually infinite (again, from the vantage point of the photon)?

By this I mean V=D/T where V=velocity, D=distance and T=time

Speed is relative to distance traveled in a given unit of time. If T reaches 0 (zero) the calculation cannot be performed & speed cannot be determined.

In another example, if you were in a car traveling at 1C, your speedometer wouldn't function. It requires space and time to calulate speed.

Is this right? Does anyone have any thoughts on this?

I also have a follow-up question.

Thanks!
atymtrvlr
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You went off the rails at the very beginning

atymtrvlr said:
Is this right?...
According to Einstein an object traveling at relativistic speeds would not experience the passage of time (time stands still).

No, "relativistic velocities" means "fast enough that relativistic formulas must be used". You are thinking of taking the limit v \rightarrow c=1 in the Lorentz transformation, but this fails as you can check. Physically speaking the reason is easy to understand: if you try to accelerate a particle of mass m to the speed of light you will need an infinite amount of energy, which is impossible.

Several items from the sci.physics FAQ should help: see http://www.math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/
 
Thanks

For the response.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...

Similar threads

Back
Top