Relativity - time in different reference frames

AI Thread Summary
An astronaut traveling at 0.500c measures her pulse rate at 75 beats per minute, but an Earth-based observer measures it differently due to time dilation effects. The calculations show that the Earth observer should measure a pulse rate of approximately 64.9 bpm, highlighting the counterintuitive nature of relativity. The astronaut's pulse is considered proper time since it is stationary relative to her frame of reference, while the Earth observer sees it as moving, leading to discrepancies in measurements. The discussion emphasizes the complexity of understanding time in different reference frames and the challenges posed by relativity. Overall, the conversation reflects the confusion surrounding these concepts in physics.
Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement



An astronaut is traveling in a space vehicle moving at
0.500c relative to the Earth. The astronaut measures her
pulse rate at 75.0 beats per minute. Signals generated by
the astronaut’s pulse are radioed to the Earth when the
vehicle is moving in a direction perpendicular to the line
that connects the vehicle with an observer on the Earth.
(a) What pulse rate does the Earth-based observer measure?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


t_{astronaut}=\gamma t_{earth}

\gamma = 1.154701

Then \Delta t_{earth} = 51.962 s

\frac{75beats}{51.962s} = 1.443beats/s \frac{60s}{min} = 86.66 bpm

should be 64.9 bpm.

1_{}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2mqq04i.png
 
But they are saying beats PER minute not minutes per beat. It's totally counter intuitive the way that they are doing it. What a joke question.
 
The beats are like a clock, with a period 0.8 s. This is the proper time on the spaceship. An observer outside the ship notices, due to time dilation, that the period is longer. This translates into less beats per minute.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I thought the proper time was always the stationary one?
 
The idea of "stationary" doesn't work well with relativity. It could be easily argued that the ship is stationary and the Earth is moving with respect to it. Therefore, the definition of proper time is that the clock in question has not moved in a particular reference frame. For the astronaut, her "clock" is her pulse. Her pulse travels with her and is therefore "stationary" with respect to the ship. This is proper time. For the observers on Earth, her "clock" is moving. It was to the left in one instance and now it is moved to the right a little. This, is measured time.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Gah this is so confusing. Everything was great until Einstein came along and ruined it.

Alas, my struggle continues. Thank you for the help Sir!
 
You're welcome.
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
970
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top