Relatvitiy - Spaceship traveling into Galaxy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nitric
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxy Spaceship
AI Thread Summary
A spaceship aims to cross the galaxy, approximately 3x10^20 meters in radius, in 25 years as measured on board. To determine the required speed, it's essential to convert the distance into light years, resulting in about 31,712.47 light years. The time experienced on the spaceship cannot be directly compared to the time on Earth due to relativistic effects, necessitating the use of the Lorentz contraction formula. This formula relates the proper length and the contracted length, allowing for the calculation of velocity. The discussion highlights the importance of using consistent frames of reference in relativistic calculations.
Nitric
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
1.The radius of our galaxy is approx. 3x10^20 m. A spaceship sets out to cross the galaxy in 25 years, as measured on board the ship. With what uniform speed does the spaceship need to travel? How long wold the trip take, as measured by a timepiece stationed on Earth?
2. v=d/t
3. So far I have converted the 25 years into seconds using proportions of 1 yr = 31556952 to get 788923800 seconds in 25 years. I found the velocity using v=d/t. d = radius of galaxy and t = 788923800 seconds

I am not sure if I am doing this right, and what do I have to do find out how long this trip would take? I don't think my distance is correct

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nitric said:
1.The radius of our galaxy is approx. 3x10^20 m. A spaceship sets out to cross the galaxy in 25 years, as measured on board the ship. With what uniform speed does the spaceship need to travel? How long wold the trip take, as measured by a timepiece stationed on Earth?



2. v=d/t
You can't use that equation with the values given since the "d" is given in the frame of the galaxy and the "t" is in the frame of the spaceship. You need to use all values in one frame. You could express the time it takes in the frame of the galaxy in terms of the time in the frame of the spaceship. If it takes 25 yrs in the frame of the ship, how long does it take in the frame of the galaxy? (you can't get a number but you can find an expression in terms of the 25 years and of the speed). Once you have that time "t'", then you may use v = d/t'. And you will be able to solve for the speed v.
 
Last edited:
Oops, nrgd has given a far better answer! I fear I missed something - not surprising with relativity.
 
nrqed said:
You can't use that equation with the values given since the "d" is given in the frame of the galaxy and the "t" is in the frame of the spaceship. You need to use all values in one frame. You could express the time it takes in the frame of the galaxy in terms of the time in the frame of the spaceship. If it takes 25 yrs in the frame of the ship, how long does it take in the frame of the galaxy? (you can't get a number but you can find an expression in terms of the 25 years and of the speed). Once you have that time "t'", then you may use v = d/t'. And you will be able to solve for the speed v.
I knew there was something wrong with using the radius as my d. thanks for that, but I'm still unsure of how to attack the problem
 
Nitric said:
I knew there was something wrong with using the radius as my d. thanks for that, but I'm still unsure of how to attack the problem

If it takes 25 years in the ship's frame, it will take (gamma times 25) years as measured in the galaxy's frame.
 
I got through a little bi t of the problem. I learned that I had to convert the radius of the galaxy into light years and use it as the length.

Converting 3x10^20m to lights years is -> 31712.47 light years. I have to use the formula L(v) = L_0 * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) Now I have two lengths in this equation, I have one of the length (31712.47 lt yrs) what should be the other length? I am trying to solve for velocity from that equation ( L(v) = L_0 * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) )
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top