Relaxation time and average electron velocity in Drude model

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the Drude model's treatment of electron relaxation time (τ) and average electron velocity. It clarifies that τ represents the average time between collisions for electrons in a metal under an electric field. The average velocity derived from the model is questioned, particularly the transition from using τ to a simplified average velocity expression. The confusion arises from interpreting τ as the time for maximum velocity rather than the average time for collisions. Ultimately, the relationship between average velocity, current density, and the definition of τ is emphasized as a critical point of understanding in the model.
Sunny Singh
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
If τ is the relaxation time, τ means, on average the time between two collisions for an electron moving under a constant electric field inside a metal. Now according to the assumptions of drude model, the electron acquires an additional velocity of \frac{-eEt}{m}where t is the time elapsed since its last collision. The average velocity of the electron between time t=0 and t=τ (since an average electron spends time τ under acceleration) must be \frac{-eE}{m}\frac{1}{τ} \int_{0}^{τ} t dt=\frac{-eEτ}{2m} but in all the books, they simply write <t>=τ and hence the average electron velocity becomes \frac{-eEτ}{m}I don't understand how they can write this if they really mean τ to be the time it takes, on average for an electron to collide with another ion. Doesn't this make their definition of average velocity to be maximum velocity acquired by electrons? And if so how can this maximum velocity of an electron be used to find the current density? I think I'm confused here at something very basic about averages. Please explain me the point where I'm messing up the logic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Drude model assumes non-interacting electrons moving in the positive background with some friction. The EoM thus is
$$m \dot{\vec{v}}=q \vec{E} -m \gamma \vec{v}.$$
In the DC case you have
$$\vec{v}=\frac{q}{m \gamma} \vec{E}.$$
Further
$$\vec{j} = q n \vec{v}=\frac{q^2 n}{m \gamma} \vec{E},$$
where ##n## is the conduction-electron-number density. From this the el. conductivity is
$$\sigma=\frac{q^3 n}{m \gamma}.$$
The relaxation time is ##\tau=1/\gamma##. It's the average free time. The distribution of the free time is
$$P(t)=N \exp(-\gamma t).$$
Normalization
$$\int_0^{\infty} \mathrm{d} t P(t)=\frac{N}{\gamma}=1 \;\Rightarrow \; N=\gamma.$$
From this
$$\langle t \rangle = \int_0^{\infty} \mathrm{d} t P(t)=-\gamma \partial_{\gamma} \int_0^{\infty} \exp(-\gamma t)=-\gamma \partial_{\gamma} \frac{1}{\gamma}=\frac{1}{\gamma}=\tau.$$
 
  • Like
Likes Sunny Singh
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top