Discussion Overview
The discussion centers on finding the remainder when \(3^{2^n}-1\) is divided by \(2^{n+3}\). The scope includes mathematical reasoning and proof techniques, particularly induction.
Discussion Character
- Mathematical reasoning
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant claims that \(3^{2^n}-1\) is an odd multiple of \(2^{n+2}\) and provides a proof by induction to support this claim.
- The base case for \(n=1\) is shown to be true, as \(3^{2^1}-1 = 8\), which is an odd multiple of \(2^3\).
- The inductive step involves showing that \(3^{2^{n+1}} - 1\) can be expressed as a product of two factors, where the first factor is an odd multiple of \(2^{n+2}\) and the second factor is also shown to be an odd multiple of \(2\).
- Another participant expresses admiration for the proof provided and reflects on their own experience with similar problems.
- There are comments regarding the notation and clarity of the expression \(3^{2^n}\) versus \((3^2)^n\), with one participant acknowledging a misunderstanding in their earlier reasoning.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
While one participant presents a proof that leads to a specific conclusion about the remainder, there are indications of confusion and differing interpretations of the notation, suggesting that not all participants may fully agree on the clarity or correctness of the reasoning.
Contextual Notes
Some participants express uncertainty regarding the notation used in the expressions, which may affect the understanding of the problem. The discussion does not resolve these notational issues.
Who May Find This Useful
Readers interested in mathematical proofs, particularly those involving induction and modular arithmetic, may find this discussion relevant.