I Remains of collapsed stars as touching binary planets?

AI Thread Summary
A binary star system could theoretically leave behind solid metallic spheres after an explosive event, but these would not be made of gold or alloys due to the nature of stellar nucleosynthesis. Instead, remnants would likely consist of iron or carbon, as heavy elements like gold are produced alongside other elements during stellar events. The concept of maintaining two separate solid masses in contact without merging is physically improbable, especially given that celestial bodies tend to aggregate due to gravitational forces. Contact binary stars remain separate due to their orbital dynamics and the balance of gravitational and centrifugal forces. The discussion emphasizes the need for physical accuracy in speculative scenarios, particularly for creative writing.
dconnell
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Would it be in any way physically possible for a binary star system to evaporate / explode, leaving behind two spheres of a solid metal such as gold (or an alloy), which were then rigid enough to drift together and maintain their shapes, rather than just collapsing into a larger sphere?

And, for bonus points, does anyone know any kind of gravity simulation software I could use to map what that combined field would look like?

Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Kleopatra fits that description.

Not a planet. Planet sized objects always morph into spheroids or bud off moons and/or debris.

Stars won't leave behind any alloy made of scarce elements. You could get a ball of mostly iron or one made of mostly carbon etc. Events that create gold will also create the other heavy elements.

The Rouche lobe might be the model you want.
 
Thanks for the reply. This is for a story I'm writing, which I want to be as physically accurate as possible, but I'm not a physicist...

A couple follow on questions if that's ok (I've googled but not quite found the answers):

Could any stellar event produce about an Earth's mass of gold?

If that mass was homogeneous/solid, ie not a rubble pile, and cold without a distinct core, would two of these masses in contact still definitely aggregate?

What if they were orbiting each other such that the centrifugal force was enough to keep them touching but separate, even if only for a couple million years or so?

None of this has to be at all likely, just not physically impossible under exactly the right conditions.

And what keeps contact binary stars which don't combine from doing so?

Cheers.
 
dconnell said:
Could any stellar event produce about an Earth's mass of gold?
You mean a 'random' event, as opposed to some 'Engineered' event? Pretty definitely NO, I'm afraid.
Like throwing a shuffled pack of cards on the table and picking them up in order without looking - but much more so.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
3I/ATLAS, also known as C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and formerly designated as A11pl3Z, is an iinterstellar comet. It was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station at Río Hurtado, Chile on 1 July 2025. Note: it was mentioned (as A11pl3Z) by DaveE in a new member's introductory thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/brian-cox-lead-me-here.1081670/post-7274146 https://earthsky.org/space/new-interstellar-object-candidate-heading-toward-the-sun-a11pl3z/ One...

Similar threads

Back
Top