Removing duplicate graphics in attachments

  • Thread starter Thread starter jackmell
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the desire to remove duplicate graphic attachments in forum posts to enhance the visual appeal and professionalism of the forum. Users express that having both thumbnails and embedded graphics creates redundancy and clutter. It is noted that the current forum software automatically deletes unattached images, complicating the removal of duplicates. Suggestions include using image hosting sites or specific file formats like .bmp or .png to achieve better results without clutter. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for a cleaner, more streamlined approach to graphic attachments in forum posts.
jackmell
Messages
1,806
Reaction score
54
Hi,

I was just wondering, in an effort to make the forum more classy-looking, and I know I already asked this question but it was never really answered by the administration, is there anyway to remove the redundant graphics attachments when I add an attachments, then go on to link that attachment in the actual body of the thread using the PF link and not some other off-site link.

All I'm saying is that it's just redundant-looking to have duplicate copies of the graphics.

Here's my example in case it's something you guys are interested in looking into it:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=727915

I believe if you remove the thumbnail and only have the embedded graphics, it more professional-looking and reduces clutter don't you guys think?

Ok thanks,
Jack
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It would look better, unfortunately, forum software deletes attachments that are not attached to any post. No idea if anything can be done without modifying the engine (which is easier said than done).
 
jackmell said:
I believe if you remove the thumbnail and only have the embedded graphics, it more professional-looking and reduces clutter don't you guys think?

Ok thanks,
Jack

The image hosting sites like s2.postimg.org give the best results.
Otherwise if you use bitmap image files (.bmp extension) then the thumbnail is replaced by a minuscule icon which is :
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=64719&stc=1&d=1386852679
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Enigman said:
The image hosting sites like s2.postimg.org give the best results.
Otherwise if you use bitmap image files (.bmp extension) then the thumbnail is replaced by a minuscule icon which is :
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=64719&stc=1&d=1386852679

But that involves a third-party which I have to first log into, upload the file, cut the link out, log out, then log into PF.

I think it would be cleaner if we could just do all that here.
 
jackmell said:
But that involves a third-party which I have to first log into, upload the file, cut the link out, log out, then log into PF.

I think it would be cleaner if we could just do all that here.

You don't need to login or have an account in postimg.org...but yes its a bit more tiresome than doing it in-house. I suggest using .bmp or .png files as they look better than thumbnails generated by using jpegs.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top