Removing thermocouple from stovetop

  • Thread starter Thread starter mbrmbrg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermocouple
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the issue of a malfunctioning thermocouple in a gas burner, specifically regarding the potential removal of the thermocouple and replacement with a wire. Participants explore the implications of bypassing the thermocouple, safety concerns, and the differences between thermocouples and other flame safety devices.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses frustration with a malfunctioning thermocouple and considers replacing it with a wire to achieve higher temperatures.
  • Another participant advises against bypassing the thermocouple, citing significant safety risks, including the potential for explosion and fire.
  • Some participants reflect on past experiences with gas stoves lacking thermocouples, questioning the logic behind their concerns.
  • A participant mentions that not all flame safety devices labeled as thermocouples are actually thermocouples, introducing the concept of capillary thermostats.
  • Concerns are raised about the proper positioning of burners and the risk of misalignment affecting the thermocouple's function.
  • One participant doubts the feasibility of defeating the safety feature of the thermocouple.
  • Another participant explains that a plain wire would not replicate the function of a thermocouple, which generates a temperature-dependent voltage.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the safety and functionality of bypassing the thermocouple. There is no consensus on whether removing the thermocouple is advisable, with some strongly opposing the idea due to safety concerns, while others share personal anecdotes that challenge the necessity of such safety features.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various types of flame safety devices and their functions, highlighting the complexity of the issue. There are unresolved questions about the specific type of safety device in the participant's stove and the implications of replacing it.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals experiencing issues with gas burners, those interested in the functionality of thermocouples and safety devices, and anyone considering modifications to gas appliances may find this discussion relevant.

mbrmbrg
Messages
485
Reaction score
2
Our gas burners have thermocouples so the gas turns off if the flame goes out. Our power burner has an undiagnosed issue that causes the gas supply to get cut off even if the flame is burning.

We've replaced the thermocouple, cleaned the (clean) flame spreader, and unclogged the (clear) gas line. Research has revealed that thermocouples are a known bug in our secondhand stove top.

At this point, I just want a burner that can heat up oil past 275oF, so I'm ready to take out the thermocouple and replace it with a plain ol' wire. Do you people think that will work?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Continue troubleshooting until the problem is no longer undiagnosed, then take the appropriate measures to safely remedy it.

Answer the question "What's the worst that could happen?" by bypassing the thermocouple. In this case it is an increased potential of explosion and fire leading to fatalities.
 
Yeeeaaah... That's my husband's issue with my little solution. I say we've never blown up anything with any of our previous gas stoves that all lacked this feature, which is, admittedly, poor logic.
 
mbrmbrg said:
Yeeeaaah... That's my husband's issue with my little solution. I say we've never blown up anything with any of our previous gas stoves that all lacked this feature, which is, admittedly, poor logic.
While investigating a recent question about thermocouples I learned not all of the flame safety devices used in gas burners called thermocouples actually are. Rather, some are capillary thermostats, or another type of sensor.

Second, chances are good your previous gas stoves had flame sensors. The best timeline I've found so far is from a company that remanufactures gas valves for antique stoves - flame safety systems first appeared in the 1930's, and by the late 1950's, stoves without any flame safety systems were no longer in wide distribution.
 
If it is a capillary thermostat, like the flame-failure safety device on an old 'central heating' unit I used to wrangle, you MUST replace 'like for like'. It simply will not work otherwise.

On ours, you'd twist then hold in the small 'warm-up' knob, press the 'piezo' button to light the pilot, then wait while that heated the main burner unto 'READY', as defined by the sensor. This could take so long, I had to improvise a jig...
 
The people that did blow themselves up aren't around any more to warn you not to bypass the thermocouple.

Many burners create a ring of many individual flames one of which lines up with the thermocouple. If the burner is taken apart for cleaning it must be put back in the right position or the thermocouple might be "between flames".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic
Thank you all for your input! Good to know about thermocouples vs capillary thermostats.
I liked the idea of putting the burner back in the wrong position, because that's a super-easy fix. But our burners cleverly have two holes, one for the igniter and one for the thermocouple (unless it's a capillary thermostat!), so the flame spreader only fits on in one position.

I'll let you know what I end up doing...
(But you guys don't need to worry: there's no way my husband is going to let me risk blowing up our house and the people therein.)
 
mbrmbrg said:
(But you guys don't need to worry: there's no way my husband is going to let me risk blowing up our house and the people therein.)
We worry anyway. Please do not bypass this safety feature.
 
I doubt it's possible to defeat this safety feature.
 
  • #10
mbrmbrg said:
I'm ready to take out the thermocouple and replace it with a plain ol' wire. Do you people think that will work?
It shouldn't... just plain ol' wire won't provide the same function as a thermocouple...
A thermocouple produces a temperature-dependent voltage as a result of the thermoelectric effect, and this voltage can be interpreted to measure temperature.
You probably know all that already, but other readers might not... :wink:
 
  • #11
Good point. A plain wire will probably look like a cold thermocouple turning the gas off not on.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OCR

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
15K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K