Yikes, im really starting to spam this place up!(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

On the subject of curvature, it says that we can reparametrize the cure in terms of arc length instead of time. If we have time,t, and arc length s(t), we can write it as t=t(s).

It seems to me that this is NOT true in general, if you cannot factor t from s(t), then there is no way relate t in terms of t(s). So under what conditons is this true, and could you show a proof that shows that these conditions will insure reparametrization?

Secondly,

the curvature is defined as the rate of change of the unit tangent vector with respect to arc length.

I cannot see why they would choose this definition of curvature. What reasoning is behind using this as the definition?

Thanks,

Cyrus

ADDITION:Since not all functions can be parametrized in terms of arc length, that means that not all fuctions have cuvature, but all functions DO have arc length. Is that correct?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Reparametrize the cure in terms of arc length instead of time

Loading...

Similar Threads - Reparametrize cure terms | Date |
---|---|

B Second derivative differential equations in terms of y? | Jul 21, 2017 |

B Taylor Polynomials and decreasing terms | Mar 15, 2017 |

I Derivative with several terms in denominator | Feb 6, 2017 |

I Vector Calculus: What do these terms mean? | Dec 2, 2016 |

Reparametrizing a space curve in terms of arclength: | May 15, 2004 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**