Replication of Photosynthesis Through Chemisty?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on exploring methods to purify air and reduce CO2 emissions, particularly through the lens of alternative energy. The initial focus was on ionization for air purification, but concerns about ozone production at low altitudes led to a reevaluation of this approach. The conversation then shifted to the potential of replicating photosynthesis as a more viable solution for reversing CO2 emissions. The inquiry seeks feedback on whether similar studies have been conducted and highlights the challenges involved in such ambitious projects. The mention of titanium oxide in relation to photosynthesis suggests an interest in innovative materials that could facilitate this process.
fcpeace17
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am an electrical engineer currently studying alternative energy, and I realize this would be a very difficult task but I would like some feedback on whether this study has been attempted or if people are afraid to attack it. When trying to think of how to purify the air i first turned to ionization, then i found out it produced ozone and at low altitudes ozone is bad... if only there was a way to rocket the ozone produced from ionization up into the stratosphere... SO THEN i turned to photosynthesis, what would be the fundamental requirements to replicate photosynthesis, to reverse the large CO2 gas emissions? Evan Wayton
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top