Representations of periodic functions

AI Thread Summary
There are three main forms to represent periodic functions: trigonometric (sin/cos), exponential, and amplitude/phase (abs/arg). The conversion between these forms can be achieved using specific formulas, such as those involving A, φ, and ψ for trigonometric expressions. The Fourier series provides a method for transitioning between exponential and amplitude/phase representations. Additionally, the discussion highlights examples of periodic functions, including those without a fundamental period. The relationships between these forms can be understood through phasor diagrams and Euler's relations, which facilitate conversions between trigonometric and exponential expressions.
Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
Correct me if I'm wrong, but exist 3 forms for represent periodic functions, by sin/cos, by exp and by abs/arg.

I know that given an expression like a cos(θ) + b sin(θ), I can to corvert it in A cos(θ - φ) or A sin(θ + ψ) through of the formulas:

A² = a² + b²

tan(φ) = b/a
sin(φ) = b/A
cos(φ) = a/A

tan(ψ) = a/b
sin(ψ) = a/A
cos(ψ) = b/A


The serie Fourier have other conversion, this time between exponential form and amplitude/phase
f(t)=\gamma_0+2\sum_{n=1}^{\infty } \gamma_n cos\left ( \frac{2 \pi n t}{T}+\varphi_n \right )
##\gamma_0 = c_0##
##\gamma_n = abs(c_n)##
##\varphi_n = arg(c_n)##

I think that exist a triangular relation. Correct? If yes, could give me the general formulas for convert an form in other?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Jhenrique said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but exist 3 forms for represent periodic functions, by sin/cos, by exp and by abs/arg.

f(x) = 0 if x is rational, f(x) = 1 if x is irrational. This is a periodic function without a fundamental period.

g(x) = 2 if x is an integer, g(x) = 1 if x is non-integer rational, g(x) = 0 if x is irrational. This is a periodic function with fundamental period equal to 1.
 
I think that exist a triangular relation. Correct?
Don't know what that means.

If yes, could give me the general formulas for convert an form in other?
The three forms you talk about are related via a phasor diagram and the euler relations.

Also see:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=432185 #6.
... to understand how a function can be periodic with no fundamental period.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Don't know what that means.

See my book of math in annex... I have 3 distinct representations for Fourier series. But I think that my relations in my book aren't very well connected. For example: given a expression like a cos(θ) + b sin(θ) how convert it in expression like c exp(θ ± φ)?
 

Attachments

  • dsa.jpg
    dsa.jpg
    28.1 KB · Views: 444
You can turn a trig expression to and from an exponential one using the Euler relations.
$$\exp i\theta = \cos\theta + i\sin\theta = x+iy$$

You can also get the relations between them by using one definition to expand the other one.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top