Requirements for Applied Math Grad. Programs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around an undergraduate student pursuing a double major in mechanical engineering and mathematics, expressing a preference for applied mathematics over pure mathematics. The student is exploring the implications of their school's lenient math degree requirements, which allow for a focus on applied courses without the necessity of taking foundational pure math classes like real analysis or abstract algebra. Key points include the student's inquiry about the essential courses needed for admission into applied math graduate programs and whether depth in applied topics is more beneficial than breadth in pure math. Responses emphasize that while applied programs may prioritize applied coursework, familiarity with pure math concepts is crucial, especially for the Math GRE, which covers a range of topics including real analysis and abstract algebra. It is advised that the student consider taking at least some pure math courses to ensure a well-rounded education and adequate preparation for graduate studies. Engaging in proof-based courses is also recommended to enhance mathematical reasoning skills, which are valuable in both applied and theoretical contexts.
anonymity
Messages
162
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I am an undergrad double majoring in mechanical engineering and mathematics. I want to say, up front, that I cannot really see myself ever pursuing a degree in pure math. I expect (at least, for now this is the case -- who knows what the future actually holds), that I will stay in some field of engineering or applied math.

The reason I am posting this question is that my school has very lenient requirements for their mathematics degree. I am essentially allowed to pick whichever courses I want to take, and am only required to take 30 credits (caclulus, ODEs, linear algebra, etc.. All lower-level things that engineers and science majors would be taking, with the exception of an intro to proofs course, on set theory). As for all of the other courses (mostly upper-level) the student has a high level of decision power (assuming they fulfill the math credit requirements, and the upper level math requirements -- both credit number requirements, not specific courses).

Currently, I am planning on taking all "applied" courses (ie, no pure math -- no real/complex analysis or proof based LA or abstract algebra). Everything is basically differential equations, mathematical modeling, or numerical analysis.

So I guess my question has two parts:

a) What is the absolute-minimum, got to have it list of courses for someone looking to get into an applied math Masters/PhD program? (I assume the answer is different for the two cases?)

b) I have always heard that Grad programs prefer depth over breadth. Does this apply to my situation? I ask because I would much rather go deeper into applied math (by taking graduate level courses in numerical analysis or differential equations) in my undergrad as opposed to stepping back from what I would like to study in grad school, just to glance at real analysis or abstract algebra, and have it forgotten in a year..

EDIT:

My post does not seem to be very well received (atleast in the immediate sense), so I will try and define "the absolute minimum list" a little better. I think it is clear that I am leaning away from pure maths, but I am looking to find out if not having the really basic/fundamental pure math courses that most schools will require for one acquire a math degree (eg, Real Analysis or proof based LA) will hurt me in the admission process for an applied math program.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I too am looking to apply to Applied Math grad programs, so I can't offer too much advice, but I'll try. From what I've seen, most programs will require that you take the Math GRE, which covers topics such as real/complex analysis, statistics, combinatorics, abstract algebra, topology, etc., on top of linear algebra, calculus, ODEs. So at the very least you should be familiar enough with these topics to not fail horrifically on the subject test. Applied programs may not care as much as Pure programs about how high you score, but I can imagine that doing poorly will not help your application.

I suppose that it would make sense for you to take some 'pure math' courses to give breadth to your undergrad education and to prepare you for the GRE. I would suggest taking analysis courses at the very least. Also, don't shy away from proof based courses because they aren't applied enough. You will have to do plenty of proofs throughout a mathematical career, and it would be a good idea to try to take one proof class each semester just to get yourself ready. I've only taken three heavily proof based courses so far, but they have changed the way I look at math in a very large way. One of the courses was actually an introductory applied math course, and I had to prove special cases for the heat, wave, and Laplace equations. It was easily the most difficult class I have ever taken, and I've taken a grad class in number theory!
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Back
Top