Residue Calculus: Evaluating Poles and Contours

  • Thread starter Thread starter eeuler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Residue
eeuler
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


25f36ae.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution


So there are poles at: z=\pm2 and at z= -1 of order 4. Right?

My query is, when evaluating these poles (using the residue theorem), is it right that for (i) Z = 1/2, no residues lie in that contour?
for (iii), do all residues lie in the contour?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Right about the poles, but for the rest, are you just guessing? Why don't you draw a graph? No, I don't think the triangle in iii) includes all poles.
 
^^I wasn't sure how to determine whether a pole is inside a specified contour but my tutor suggested drawing a graph, which i have been doing, in which case shouldn't (i) have no poles in the contour? As for (iii) then, would Z=+2, and Z=-1 lie in the contour?
 
Your tutor is wise. Yes, i) contains no poles and iii) contains z=(-1) and z=2.
 
^^Thanks :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top