Resistance Measurement for Temperature Sensing

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on measuring small resistance changes (approximately 1 ohm) in relation to temperature variations using a circuit setup. Scott seeks advice on optimizing his measurement system, which currently utilizes a difference amplifier and a computer interface for analog inputs. Key recommendations include using a 4-point measurement method with a constant current source, employing an instrumentation amplifier like the INA101 for signal amplification, and implementing a Kelvin connection to minimize measurement errors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 4-point resistance measurement techniques
  • Familiarity with instrumentation amplifiers, specifically the INA101
  • Knowledge of Ohm's Law and basic circuit design
  • Experience with constant current sources and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implementation of 4-terminal Kelvin connections for accurate resistance measurements
  • Learn about the design and functionality of instrumentation amplifiers like the INA101
  • Explore constant current source circuits for precise resistance measurement
  • Investigate methods for optimizing signal amplification to fit within a 0-5 volt range
USEFUL FOR

Electronics engineers, researchers in temperature sensing, and anyone involved in precision resistance measurement and circuit design.

scott_alexsk
Messages
335
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have been working on a circuit to measure the resistance change of a wire vs. temperature, as to glean information about the internal phases. The changes in resistance I am dealing with are only about 1 ohm.

Is there any standard system for grabbing such a small resistance? Currently I have a computer interface that hooks up to the usb port on my computer, and can take analog inputs ranging from 0-5 volts.

I am working on a setup w/ a difference amp, to amplify the difference between a small preset voltage, and the voltage being dropped over the wire, but is there a better way? Please note that I do not need the actual resistance, but just a good relative measurement to mark the phase changes.

Thanks,
-Scott
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Sir Charles Wheatstone
 
Well, a bridge is the most accurate way but it is usually quite inconvenient unless you happen to have an automated bridge (e.g. something like the AVS-47B from Picowatt).
But 1 Ohm is a rather large change, a standard 4-point measurement will do.
Just pass a known current through the resistor (if you don't have a current source a voltage source in series with a resistance MUCH larger than the resistance of the wire will do) and measure the voltage across the wire.
Then you get the resistance using Ohm's law.

Btw, it is usually best to measure the current as well, so if your interface has several inputs you should measure it directly by simply measuring the voltage across the large (known) bias resistor (or,even better, a separate small high-precision resistor connected in series).
 
There are a few more conditions that I did not mention before that make it more difficult than that. Firstly the wire itself ideally cannot have a significant amperage (about 0.05 amps or above), because any significant amperage, if passed through the wire for anything but a short time, will change the resistance measurement, by inducing a martensite transformation in the wire I am working with. Additionally I need to amplify this signal so that it will fill as much of the 0-5 volt range, so that I can get the maximum resolution with my computer interface. Additionally many of these measurements need to be taken, so I can't do something like move around a potentiometer until I get a null-voltage.

Thanks
-Scott
 
I would think you could use a good quality op-amp to amplify the small voltage developed across 1 ohm.
 
I just want to mention also, that though the total magnitude of change is about 1 ohm, I am also looking for the very fine details contained in that range. The solution that my electronics teacher and I came up with to optimize the produced values to the measuring range of 0-5 volts, was to use a difference amp with one input's voltage set, to zero out the measurement initially (or w/ some buffer). A flexibility in the circuit is necessary because the resistance of the wire I am working with varies between 4 and 7 ohms depending on what I have done to it. I cannot work on the circuit right now, but I am interested in the best solution I can get.

Thank you guys for your help!
-scott
 
Here is how HP did it. This is a 30 year old transistor based milliohm meter. Page 23.

http://cp.literature.agilent.com/litweb/pdf/04328-90008.pdf

Basically, run a constant current through a resistor you are measuring and then measure the voltage across your resistor.

The HP design uses an AC 1 KHz current source with some kind of a phase lock loop.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Use an instrumentation type amplifier... such as INA101.

Also use 4 terminal connection to the sample... 2 terminals for the current and 2 terminals for the measurement.

It's known as Kelvin connection.
 
Ok then... setting up the kelvin connection seems pretty standard w/ the constant current source and all that...but what would be the best way to amplify the voltage drop I get from the second set of connections? If the drop I have is a few millivolts at best, what would be the best way to dilate it to the 5 volt range?

Thanks,
-Scott
 
  • #10
Amplification?

The hint was in the mention of the INA101... it's an instrumentation amplifier and you use 1 resistor to set the required gain.

It has very high Common mode rejection ratio so noise pickup is minimised.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
6K