Resistors in series, parallel or?

  • Thread starter fog37
  • Start date
  • #1
1,047
61
Hello Forum,

When resistors are introduced, it is explained that they can be either in series or in parallel configuration. In series means that the are traversed by the same current and one of the terminals of each resistor is connected to the other's terminal( I am saying that because there can be two resistors in a circuit that are traversed by the same current but not be in series).

In parallel means that the terminals of two resistors are connected to each other and to a wire/conductor that is equipotential while the other two terminals are also interconnected to a wire that equipotential as well but at a different potential than the other wire. The voltage drop across both resistors is the same.

I believe that two or more resistors can be connected in such a way that they are not in series neither in parallel, i.e. they don't have the same voltage drop and are not traversed by the same current....Is that correct? I think so...
Do you have any good example?

Thanks,
fog37
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
8,699
5,591
Maybe you draw a picture of thst arrangement for us.
 
  • #3
1,047
61
Ok, see the attachment. The top resistor is neither in series or in parallel with any of the two lower resistors (which are in series)....

This should confirm my initial thinking...
 

Attachments

  • #4
Averagesupernova
Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,649
641
There has been a thread on similar subjects here on PF. If a single battery and a single resistor are hooked together, are they in series or are they in parallel? Definitions are very important when we start nit-picking about these things. Like anorlunda said, let's have a pic. :)
-
Edit: Ooops, you beat me to it.
 
  • #5
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
8,699
5,591
Nice try, but no cigar. The bottom two resistors are in series. Replace them with a single resistance equal to the sum of the two. Call it the bottom resistor. Now the top resistor is in parallel with the bottom resistor.

We can repeat this combine and replace transformation many times in complex arrangements.
 
  • #6
Averagesupernova
Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,649
641
Nice try, but no cigar. The bottom two resistors are in series. Replace them with a single resistance equal to the sum of the two. Call it the bottom resistor. Now the top resistor is in parallel with the bottom resistor.

We can repeat this combine and replace transformation many times in complex arrangements.
It also depends on where we attach the rest of the circuit. A wise person once told me that 'everything is relative'.
 
  • #7
1,047
61
Ok, I see your point anorlunda.

But to the question "is the top resistor in series or in parallel with the first lower resistor" the answer is neither since they are not run by the same current or share the same voltage drop. I guess I am considering pairwise comparisons. MY point is that it is possible to connect one element (be it a resistor or something else) into a circuit so that it can be in series, in parallel with another specific element or neither. It is not a binary choice between being in series and being in parallel...
 
  • #8
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
8,699
5,591
Ok, I see your point anorlunda.

But to the question "is the top resistor in series or in parallel with the first lower resistor" the answer is neither since they are not run by the same current or share the same voltage drop. I guess I am considering pairwise comparisons. MY point is that it is possible to connect one element (be it a resistor or something else) into a circuit so that it can be in series, in parallel with another specific element or neither. It is not a binary choice between being in series and being in parallel...
I see what you are trying to say. But you won't win arguments or score points on exams saying it that way.
 
  • #9
1,047
61
More interesting, if you want, is solving complicated networks of resistors like the infinite ladder, etc... I wasn't familiar with those complicated cases until today.

See http://www.phy6.org/Electric/-E6-Resistors-2.htm where it says "Not all resistor circuits can be resolved into combinations of resistors in parallel and in series. Consider a "classical" problem appearing in many textbooks: A 10V voltage is appliedbetween opposite corners (A,B) of a cubeconsisting of 12 resistors of 1Ω each. How much current will flow--or in other words, what is the equivalent resistance R between A and B?......This circuit cannot be resolved into separate resistors in parallel and in series (at least not in the usual way)....."
 
  • #10
meBigGuy
Gold Member
2,323
405
You are correct in saying that grouping all resistor connectivity topologies into series or parallel is not complete if you are considering networks of resistors. In that case, the networks are in series or parallel. And, even that gets shaky when you consider bridge circuits.
 

Related Threads on Resistors in series, parallel or?

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
19
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
2K
Top