Resolving Discrepancies in Photon Gas Thermodynamics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around reconciling two results regarding photon gas thermodynamics, specifically the Gibbs free energy and pressure equations. The user struggles with the differentiation of pressure and entropy relationships, leading to a conflict between derived results. It is clarified that the transformation from the Gibbs free energy equation to the pressure-entropy relationship may not be valid, as it should involve the Gibbs potential rather than the entropy at constant volume. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying thermodynamic identities and differentiating appropriately. Further guidance is sought to resolve the discrepancies in the calculations.
ed321
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I’m struggling to reconcile two results about the behaviour of a photon gas, any help would be appreciated:
First of all the Gibbs free energy=0, which means that dG=0=Vdp-SdT
But also p=1/3 U/V and S=4/3 U/T which means p=1/4 ST/V. Now if we call the entropy per unit volume S/V=s, p=1/4sT and differentiating both sides with respect to p at constant s we get 1=1/4s dp/dT which doesn’t agree with the result from the Gibb’s function.

Homework Equations


(My expressions for G, p and S agree with wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon_gas)

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I must not be differentiating p=1/4sT correctly, but I can’t see what I need to do differently.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would this be more appropriate somewhere else?
 
Hey ed,

I'll rephrase your question for you.
Why do you think you can transform

0 = V dp - SdT

into

\frac{S}{V} = \left( \frac{\partial p}{\partial T}\right)_s

(which is really what you're comparing your derivation to - correct me if I'm mistaken.)

--------
Assaf
http://www.physicallyincorrect.com/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the reply.

I thought \frac{S}{V} = \left( \frac{\partial p}{\partial T}\right)_s
followed straight away from 0 = V dp - SdT by "dividing" by dT at constant s. Maybe this step isn't valid since you can't always treat dT like a ordinary number, but I can't see any reason this would be the case this time?

Any further advice appreciated.
Thanks
 
<br /> dG = 0 = V dp - SdT<br /> gives
<br /> \frac{S}{V} = \left( \frac{\partial p}{\partial T}\right)_G<br />, not
<br /> \frac{S}{V} = \left( \frac{\partial p}{\partial T}\right)_s<br />.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top