Resolving Power - Disadvantages

  • Thread starter Thread starter elemis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
Resolving power in spectroscopy is defined by the equation Resolvance = λ/Δλ = nN, where n is the order of the fringe and N is the number of slits. Increasing resolvance can be achieved by decreasing slit width, increasing the order of the fringe, or increasing the number of slits, though each method has potential drawbacks. Decreasing slit width may reduce transmitted light and intensity, while higher orders of fringe can lead to diminished peak intensity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of finding an optimal slit width and acknowledges that increasing the number of slits can enhance both resolution and intensity. Grating design is complex, requiring careful consideration of factors like slit density and shape to balance advantages and disadvantages effectively.
elemis
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
So I know resolving power is given by :

Resolvance = λ/Δλ = nN

Where n = order of fringe being observed and N is the no. of slits.

So I was thinking there are a few ways of increasing resolvance :

1.) Decrease the slit width
2.) Increase the order of the fringe we observe.
3.) Increase the number of slits.

However, wouldn't the first option cause a decrease in transmitted light and hence wouldn't our spectra have decreasing intensity ?

Also, for the second option, it is known that intensity of maximas decreases quite quickly from one order to the next... Hence, would our peak have poor intensity as well ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
However, wouldn't the first option cause a decrease in transmitted light and hence wouldn't our spectra have decreasing intensity ?
Right. You'll have to find the best slit width, taking both effects into account.
Also, for the second option, it is known that intensity of maximas decreases quite quickly from one order to the next...
Not if the slits are narrow ;).
 
increasing the number of slits increases resolution AND intensity
 
elemis said:
So I know resolving power is given by :

<snip>

I'm not sure what you are asking about- technologies used for high resolution spectroscopy, grating design, something else...?
 
Andy Resnick said:
I'm not sure what you are asking about- technologies used for high resolution spectroscopy, grating design, something else...?

I'm in interested in grating designs that could increase resolving power and the subsequent disadvtages.
 
technician said:
increasing the number of slits increases resolution AND intensity

So what changes could I implement that would have some disadvantages ?
 
Are you sure you want to get additional disadvantages?
- reduce the number of slits
- use a different width for different slits
- make the slits too small, or too wide
- use the screen too close to the grating, or too far away

If you want to have advantages, avoid all those points.
 
mfb said:
Are you sure you want to get additional disadvantages?
- reduce the number of slits
- use a different width for different slits
- make the slits too small, or too wide
- use the screen too close to the grating, or too far away

If you want to have advantages, avoid all those points.

Thanks ! You see what I'm really interested in is the possible trade off's.
 
elemis said:
I'm in interested in grating designs that could increase resolving power and the subsequent disadvtages.

Grating design is a complex subject that must take into account not just the density of 'lines' but also the detailed shape (the 'blaze angle', for example). I recommend starting by reading this:

http://gratings.newport.com/library/handbook/handbook.asp

It's the gold-standard reference. Also, I recommend looking at what equipment NIST or other standards labs use to perform precision (say, 1 part in 10^15) spectroscopy.
 
Back
Top