Engineering How Do You Solve RCL Circuit Problems Using Kirchhoff's Loop Rule?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving RCL circuit problems using Kirchhoff's Loop Rule. Participants clarify the differential equation governing charge q(t) and verify that the function q(t) = q_max e^-(a/t) cos(ωt) satisfies this equation under specific conditions. The critical damping resistance R_c is calculated using the given values of inductance L = 10 mH and capacitance C = 0.2 mF. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying voltage signs across circuit components to derive accurate equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Loop Rule
  • Familiarity with RCL circuit components (Resistor, Capacitor, Inductor)
  • Knowledge of differential equations in electrical circuits
  • Ability to analyze exponential decay functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the differential equation for RCL circuits
  • Learn about critical damping in RCL circuits and its implications
  • Explore the relationship between charge, current, and voltage in circuits
  • Investigate the effects of varying resistance on circuit behavior
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone seeking to understand RCL circuit dynamics and the application of Kirchhoff's Loop Rule.

physicsStudent00

Homework Statement


I'm just really lost on this topic and honestly don't have too much of an idea.
upload_2017-9-27_19-11-58.png


(a) Using Kirchoff's loop rule, find the differential equation satisfied by the charge q(t).

(b) Verify that q(t) = q_max e^-(a/t) cos(ωt) satisfies the differential equation for particular values of a and w and find these values.

(c) The resistance R_c for which w = 0 yields critical damping. If L = 10 mH and C = 0.2 mF, determine R_c.

(d) Sketch q(tL)for R < R_c, R = R_c, and R > R_c.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


a) using the loop law all voltages must add to give 0 so you use an equation that includes q for each of the voltages, giving
q/t+dq/dt*R+d^2q/dt^2*L=0

b) so if we are to solve you place it at time =0 because we want q(t)=0? therefore q(t) = q_max*e^-(a/t) and solve for "a" that way. but what original value of q(t) would be used, on top of this how would i then solve for ω.

c) i think the equation ω_0=1/√LC is used but i don't know how that translates the the question as it uses ω and not ω_0.

d) it should be exponential but I've been told me someone who is always right that I'm wrong.

any help would be greatly appreciated as I am really lost.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physicsStudent00 said:
using the loop law all voltages must add to give 0 so you use an equation that includes q for each of the voltages, giving
q/t+dq/dt*R+d^2q/dt^2*L=0
No, this is incorrect. For example, what happened to the capacitance C? Also, you need to be more careful about what signs your terms have and make sure that they all have the same physical dimension.
 
  • Like
Likes physicsStudent00
Orodruin said:
No, this is incorrect. For example, what happened to the capacitance C? Also, you need to be more careful about what signs your terms have and make sure that they all have the same physical dimension.
thanks for the help,
so how should i best approach this question then
 
physicsStudent00 said:
so how should i best approach this question then
In the way you prescribed, by going around the loop and making sure that the voltages add up to zero. However, you need to be more careful while doing so so that you get the correct result. Can you write down your argumentation for each of the terms?
 
Orodruin said:
In the way you prescribed, by going around the loop and making sure that the voltages add up to zero. However, you need to be more careful while doing so so that you get the correct result. Can you write down your argumentation for each of the terms?
this is my exact working, I am not exactly the best at using the computer for showing my working
upload_2017-9-27_19-44-9.png
 
This still does not explain your reasoning for the signs of each term. In which direction have you defined the current I? How does this relate to the potential drop across the resistor/inductor? What happens to the charge on the capacitor when you have a positive current I? (This will depend on the direction you defined as positive for I.)
 
Orodruin said:
This still does not explain your reasoning for the signs of each term. In which direction have you defined the current I? How does this relate to the potential drop across the resistor/inductor? What happens to the charge on the capacitor when you have a positive current I? (This will depend on the direction you defined as positive for I.)
i honestly have no idea, I'm really struggling with this whole topic in general.
 
You're close to the answer...
There is a sign mistake. Draw your circuit on a piece of paper. Draw the direction I is going. Then knowing the direction re-write your equations. Either 1, or 2 of the signs will change if you do it right.
 
  • Like
Likes physicsStudent00
Think about what a voltage DROP across a resistor means
 
  • Like
Likes physicsStudent00
  • #10
ok i know see what you mean, as by saying that all the voltages are adding it means each is creating a voltage which is clearly wrong. across the resistor there should be a drop in voltage so the sign will be negative, however across L and C it would have a positive sign as they both drive a charge, hence current and voltage?
 
  • #11
physicsStudent00 said:
ok i know see what you mean, as by saying that all the voltages are adding it means each is creating a voltage which is clearly wrong. across the resistor there should be a drop in voltage so the sign will be negative, however across L and C it would have a positive sign as they both drive a charge, hence current and voltage?
not quite... technically the voltage is dropped across the inductor too, my hint was only a partial hint, so slightly misleading
 
  • Like
Likes physicsStudent00
  • #12
donpacino said:
not quite... technically the voltage is dropped across the inductor too, my hint was only a partial hint, so slightly misleading
ok so starting at the capacitor and moving around the loop clockwise the sum of the voltages could be written as
V_c - V_r -V_l =0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
physicsStudent00 said:
ok so starting at the capacitor and moving around the loop clockwise the sum of the voltages could be written as
V_c - V_r -V_l =0
Yup, do you understand why?
 
  • #14
donpacino said:
Yup, do you understand why?
yeah i get it now, i just wasn't looking at the loop voltage law too literally. so the voltage the would be increased across the capacitor, then be diminished across the inductor and resistor so that it goes back to zero
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K