Resonance-The frequency of an applied force

AI Thread Summary
Resonance occurs when a periodic force's frequency matches or closely aligns with an object's natural frequency, causing the object to vibrate with large amplitude. An object has a natural frequency, which is the frequency it prefers to oscillate at, even when not in motion. This natural frequency becomes evident when the object is set into oscillatory motion. The discussion clarifies that the force itself does not possess a frequency; rather, it is the oscillation of the object that has a natural frequency. Understanding this distinction helps in grasping the concept of resonance more clearly.
Woolyabyss
Messages
142
Reaction score
1
This isn't so much homework as it is me having trouble understanding a concept.
I'm having trouble understanding resonance the definition in my book is

"If the frequency of a periodic force applied to a body is the same as or very near to its natural frequency that body will vibrate with very large amplitude. This phenomenon is called resonance."

I don't understand how a force can have a frequency when its not material.Would it not need to vibrate to have a frequency?
Any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When an object is set into any oscillatory motion it has a frequency, let's say for simplicity, that it 'prefers' to oscillate at. This is its natural frequency. It doesn't have to be in motion to have a natural frequency, but once it is set into non-forced oscillatory motion it will oscillate at its "natural frequency".

Does this clear things up?

Think of a mass-spring system horizontally, if you perturb the system and set it in motion, it will oscillate at its natural frequency after any transients have left the system.
 
electricspit said:
When an object is set into any oscillatory motion it has a frequency, let's say for simplicity, that it 'prefers' to oscillate at. This is its natural frequency. It doesn't have to be in motion to have a natural frequency, but once it is set into non-forced oscillatory motion it will oscillate at its "natural frequency".

Does this clear things up?

Think of a mass-spring system horizontally, if you perturb the system and set it in motion, it will oscillate at its natural frequency after any transients have left the system.

Ya thanks,
I read the definition a bit more closely and realized they weren't saying that the actual force itself had frequency
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top