Resource for chemistry letter and symbol definitions/values in equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights a student's struggle to understand chemistry formulas due to a lack of effective teaching from their instructor, who discourages questions and fails to explain the meanings of symbols and letters in equations. The student seeks clarity on specific terms like "Q," "Δ," "k," "R," and others, emphasizing that memorizing formulas is insufficient without understanding their components. Despite attempts to seek help from the teacher and local resources, the student finds little support. They eventually discover that searching for "reference" materials related to chemistry yields useful charts and information. The student expresses a desire for external resources to enhance their understanding of the subject.
Ascendant78
Messages
327
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a chemistry teacher who discourages students from asking questions (long story, but he's just not a good teacher). We have an online textbook, which fails to explain a lot when it comes to formulas. One thing I want to understand is what the different letters and symbols in formulas and equations mean. Like when I see a "Q" or a "Δ" in a formula, I'd like to know what those things actually mean. I don't feel like memorizing a formula does me much good if I don't know exactly what those formulas are looking for, and feel I will gain a much better understanding of the material if I understood how different aspects of chemistry are formulated together in the different equations. In both chem I and II, all our teacher does is hand us formulas, then has us plug arbitrary numbers into those formulas, but doesn't explain what those numbers actually represent, so none of us really have any idea what we are actually calculating.

Homework Equations



e-(Ea/8.314T)
ln [A] = –kt + ln [A]o
k=Ae^(-Ea/RT)

These are just a couple, but I don't know what the "e" "k" "t" "o in [A]o" "R" or "T" means.

The Attempt at a Solution



Asking my teacher has proven futile, and I am in a small school so not sure who else would be good to ask. I have tried a web search to no avail and checked my local library and bookstore to no avail as well. I am open to any materials I could get my hands on that will help me to know what it is that I'm actually calculating so I may better understand what I am doing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
e - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_(mathematical_constant)
(note: what you wrote is wrong, correct formula is e^{\frac{-E_a}{8.314T}}, where 8.314 is a value of R)

k is a rate constant (in this context)

Ea is an activation energy

t is time

[A]0 means concentration at t=0 (initial)

R is the ideal gas constant

T is temperature

There IS something very wrong about the situation you describe and about things you don't know, but I have no idea whom/what to blame.
 
Thanks for filling me in on that information. I did manage to find some additional information on the matter. The key word I was missing was "reference". Once I typed that into the search engines along with chemistry, I found a handful of useful reference charts, lists, etc., that has all of the information.

Anyway, our professor at our college is one of those types who is extremely intelligent, but has absolutely no social skills and is not good at conveying what he is trying to say to others. He is confusing, because he tries to be nice by baking us cookies from time to time, tries to tell jokes here and there (that usually fail miserably), and in some ways comes off as real nice. However, if you ask a question in class, his first step is to demean or belittle you in some way, then he will answer the question in such a convoluted way you can't understand it or will wander off on a tangent without ever even answering your question. A lot of students are very frustrated with him, and I am literally the only person in my class who got an A in Chem I last semester. Anyway, I really don't mind the situation so long as I have resources outside of class that I can utilize to gain a better understanding. Thanks again for the help.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top