Resource(s) for commercial transuranic waste composition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mesa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Composition
AI Thread Summary
The composition of transuranics in commercial PWR spent fuel varies significantly due to different fuel cycle strategies employed by utilities, with typical discharge burnups around 55 +/- 5 GWd/tU. Older, cooler fuel is generally placed in dry cask storage, although newer high burnup fuel may be mixed with it. Resources such as the OECD NEA documents provide valuable data on spent fuel characteristics, including specific tables and figures that detail composition. The ORNL has also published relevant data in conjunction with the ORIGEN/SCALE package. For comprehensive insights, consulting these references is recommended.
mesa
Gold Member
Messages
694
Reaction score
36
Hello, I am looking for a resource on the composition of transuranics in a typical commercial PWR after the fuel is cycled and put into dry cask storage. Anyone have material on this?

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There isn't a typical example of PWR spent fuel, because each utility has a different fuel cycle strategy. But discharge burnups are around 55 +/- 5 GWd/tU.
See page 51 of this document - https://www.oecd-nea.org/science/pubs/2006/nea6224-burn-up.pdf

In the US, it's usually the older cooler fuel that gets placed in dry storage, but sometime more recent high burnup fuel will be mixed with older cooler fuel of lower burnup.

ORNL has published some data on spent fuel in conjunction with the ORIGEN/SCALE package.

Very good reference: See Table 1, 3 and Figure 7 and list of references
https://www.oecd-nea.org/science/wpncs/ADSNF/SOAR_final.pdf
SOAR on Progress of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Chemistry
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mesa
Astronuc said:
There isn't a typical example of PWR spent fuel, because each utility has a different fuel cycle strategy. But discharge burnups are around 55 +/- 5 GWd/tU.
See page 51 of this document - https://www.oecd-nea.org/science/pubs/2006/nea6224-burn-up.pdf

In the US, it's usually the older cooler fuel that gets placed in dry storage, but sometime more recent high burnup fuel will be mixed with older cooler fuel of lower burnup.

ORNL has published some data on spent fuel in conjunction with the ORIGEN/SCALE package.

Very good reference: See Table 1, 3 and Figure 7 and list of references
https://www.oecd-nea.org/science/wpncs/ADSNF/SOAR_final.pdf
SOAR on Progress of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Chemistry

Very good, thank you Astronuc.

If anyone else has anything to add, please do.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top