Resources for deep understanding about nuclear fuel materials

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the microstructure evolution of nuclear fuel materials under irradiation, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding in this area. Key characteristics include the behavior of fission products and the differences between various fuel matrices such as UO2, carbides, and nitrides. The importance of cladding materials, particularly zirconium alloys and their corrosion and oxidation issues, is also emphasized. Networking opportunities are available through annual meetings like TOPFUEL and the International Topical Meeting on Light Water Reactor Fuel Performance, which facilitate communication among researchers and industry professionals. Overall, the conversation underscores the complexity of nuclear fuel behavior and the significance of collaborative research efforts.
peng.xjtu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,everybody!
I'm a PhD candidate from xi'an jiaotong university,china. There is an urgent need to make a deep understanding about the microstructure evolution of nuclear fuel materials under irradiation. To make my research more close to the frontiers, your suggestions are welcomed. I've devoted myself to the work independently, but until now, I can't find a good perspective to this field. So,my primary questions follow as,
1.what is the specific characteristic of the microstructure evolution of nuclear fuel materials?
2.what method can accurately analyze and predict the fuel behavior under high burnup?
3.Are there any communities or anybody else concentrating on this subject? Is it possible to communicate some ideas with each other?
Thanks a lot!
Best regards!
waiting for your help!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
peng.xjtu said:
Hello,everybody!
I'm a PhD candidate from xi'an jiaotong university,china. There is an urgent need to make a deep understanding about the microstructure evolution of nuclear fuel materials under irradiation. To make my research more close to the frontiers, your suggestions are welcomed. I've devoted myself to the work independently, but until now, I can't find a good perspective to this field. So,my primary questions follow as,
1.what is the specific characteristic of the microstructure evolution of nuclear fuel materials?
2.what method can accurately analyze and predict the fuel behavior under high burnup?
3.Are there any communities or anybody else concentrating on this subject? Is it possible to communicate some ideas with each other?
Thanks a lot!
Best regards!
waiting for your help!
One of my primary areas is nuclear fuel and core technology, and materials used therein.

Note that there are different materials which provide different functions.

The fuel proper is the fissile elements U-233, U-235, and Pu-239, 241 which are usually embedded in U-238 or inert matrix, which are usually ceramic forms. The fission process produces fission products that accumulate with burnup, so understanding fission product behavior (of gases, volatiles, non-metals and metals) is critical to understanding fuel behavior with burnup. The fuel matrix is usually UO2 or (U,Pu)O2, but it could be MC (carbide) or MN (nitride), where M = U and/or Pu. Carbides and nitrides have higher density and thermal conductivity, but are usually not used in LWR because of the reaction with water. Some fuel designs use ceramic-metal (cermet) matrices, and still other use metal or metal hydride matrices. The behaviors of these forms have similarities, but are also quite different as a function of burnup.

Surrounding the fuel material is the cladding, which in LWRs is usually a Zr-alloy (e.g., Zr-2 in BWRs or Zr-4 in PWRs, or more recently Zr-Nb alloys such as AREVA's M5 or Westinghouse's ZIRLO). The key issues with these alloys are corrosion/oxidation as a function of duty and burnup, irradiation hardening (with the consequence of 'notch sensitivity') and hydrogen pickup, which is a consequence of the oxidation reaction between Zr and H2O. Some people are studying the use of ceramic claddings.

For fast or liquid metal cooled reactors, the cladding material has traditionally been austenitic (e.g. SS316) or ferritic stainless steels.

In addition to changes in mechanical properties with irradiation, we are concerned about dimensional stability of the fuel and core materials.

As for community(ies), there are now annual meeting held in a rotational basis in US, Europe and Asia. The European Meeting is named TOPFUEL, and in the US it is the International Topical Meeting on Light Water Reactor Fuel Performance. There are also embedded topical meetings every two years in the ANS (American Nuclear Society) Summer Meeting. Within ANS, one will find the Material Science and Technology Division (MSTD). Many of the participants work at the fuel vendors AREVA, GNF/GEH, Toshiba/Westinghouse, the DOE labs, and academia.

One will find work published in the Journal of Nuclear Materials, which is published by Elsevier. ASTM has a triennial meeting or International Symposium: Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry.
 
Ceramic cladding? I haven't heard of that before, but it seems like metal is more advantageous concerning heat transfer and neutron capture.
 
theCandyman said:
Ceramic cladding? I haven't heard of that before, but it seems like metal is more advantageous concerning heat transfer and neutron capture.
SiC for LWR cladding - believe it or not. Personally, I'm skeptical.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top