Resultant Force: Calculating Forces with Trigonometry for a 800N and 600N Object

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the resultant force of an 800N and a 600N object using trigonometry, the forces can be represented as vectors. The first force (F1) is vertical with coordinates (0, 800), while the second force (F2) has coordinates (600 cos(30), -600 sin(30)). The resultant force can be found by summing these vectors and calculating the diagonal of the parallelogram formed. The final calculation yields a resultant force of approximately 721.1N, which is confirmed to be within a reasonable range. Accurate calculations and vector addition are essential for determining the correct resultant force.
Jud
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'm sure this problem is pretty trivial to most but apologies in advance, I'm just starting out sorry.

Homework Statement


F2-3.jpg


I'm not sure how to go about working this out due to the 800N

The Attempt at a Solution



F1 (800N) x-pos = 800 tan (90)?? , y-pos = ?
F2 (600N) x-pos = 600 cos(30) , y-pos = -600 sin(30)

Homework Statement

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can draw the parallelogram of forces, and the diagonal length (from your starting point) is the net force.

Or you can complete their conversion to vectors; F1 = 800 j, where j is the unit vector in the y-direction. Your F2 looks correct ... so now add them together!
 
UltrafastPED said:
You can draw the parallelogram of forces, and the diagonal length (from your starting point) is the net force.

Or you can complete their conversion to vectors; F1 = 800 j, where j is the unit vector in the y-direction. Your F2 looks correct ... so now add them together!

so,

F1 (800N) x-pos = 0 , y-pos = 800
F2 (600N) x-pos = 600 cos(30) , y-pos = -600 sin (30)

sqrt (519.615)^2 + (500)^2 = 721.1 N

is that correct?
 
It's certainly in the correct range ... if you are unsure you should recheck your calculations.
 
UltrafastPED said:
It's certainly in the correct range ... if you are unsure you should recheck your calculations.

Ok Thank you for the help, greatly appreciated.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top