Returns on Jointly Normal Stock

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oxymoron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normal
Oxymoron
Messages
868
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the returns on two stock are jointly normal and let's say I know the means, variances (and therefore standard deviations), and correlation of each and both.

Then if I know the return of one of the stocks over some time period, then would it be possible to calculate the return on the other over the same time period?


Homework Equations


The bivariate normal density (maybe?)
Weights of assets given their prices at time t=0.
Return on a portfolio.


The Attempt at a Solution


I have 2 of stock 1 and 5 of stock 2. Their prices are $10.50 and $15 at time 0 respectively. Therefore their weights are 0.21875 and 0.78125 respectively. The return on stock 1 is 0.06. But how do I find the return on the second stock? I'm sure there is some property of the bivariate normal probability density that I need.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll probably have to define the calculation for "return" on a stock if you want help from a wide audience.

Just taking "return" as a random variable, if you know the return for one stock, what you can get is the conditional probability distribution for the return on the other. Knowing one return doesn't remove all the uncertainty about the other one.
 
Hi Stephen. Good idea with the conditional probability distribution. Turns out you can derive a formula for the conditional bivariate (because I am considering only 2 stocks) normal density by dividing the bivariate normal density by one of the marginals. Then you can extract the conditional expectation and conditional variance from the exponential just like you would with the univariate normal density. Works a treat! Thanks for the insight!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top