Reversibility, adiabatic-ness, quasi-static

AI Thread Summary
Quasi-static processes occur with negligible acceleration, while adiabatic processes involve no heat transfer. A reversible process can be reversed without leaving any changes in the universe. The relationship between these concepts suggests that quasi-static and reversible processes can imply adiabatic conditions, but not necessarily vice versa. An experiment involving all three terms would indicate a highly controlled environment where changes can be reversed without external influence. Understanding these relationships is crucial for analyzing thermodynamic systems in statistical physics.
PatF
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I am taking a course in statistical physics where we keep using the terms in the title. I think I understand them as stand alone terms, but I do not understand any relationships. For example, does quasi-static and reversible imply adiabatic? Does one of them imply some of the others? What would all three of them together say about an experiment?

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quasi-static means negligible acceleration, i.e. effects of acceleration are negligible. adiabatic process is the process where no heat transfer takes place. reversible means the process can be reversed leaving no change in universe. the last one might be a bit hard to understand. let me explain. for example if you have hot tea, it will cool after some time. you can not reverse this process by not changing the universe, you have to use heat pump to reverse the process but it will require some work. and if you give work with your muscles that means now you are tired. so everything is back except that now you are tired which means something has changed.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top