I Revisiting Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle: Is There Room for Improvement?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter chitranshgtm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hup Mistake
chitranshgtm
Is there any mistake in Heisenberg's uncertainty principle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chitranshgtm said:
Is there any mistake in Heisnberg's Uncertanity Principle?
Yes. It is spelled "Heisenberg" and "Uncertainty".
 
  • Like
Likes Nosebgr, Imager, Physics Footnotes and 2 others
thanks...
 
chitranshgtm said:
Is there any mistake in Heisenberg's uncertainty principle?

:welcome:

This is a well accepted feature of quantum mechanics. What would make you doubt it?
 
chitranshgtm said:
Is there any mistake in Heisenberg's uncertainty principle?
It is often mistakenly stated.
 
chitranshgtm said:
Is there any mistake in Heisenberg's uncertainty principle?

Technically no, as it's a consequence of the mathematical structure of quantum theory.

That said, real particles are under no obligation to obey quantum theory.
It's just that we've never seen any disagreement between what experimental tests show and what quantum theory predicts.

That's not to say that there aren't better uncertainty principles out there.

For example, the entropic uncertainty principle:
h(x) + h(p/\hbar) \geq \log(\pi e)
is better than the Heisenberg uncertainty principle:
\sigma(x)\cdot\sigma(p)\geq\hbar/2
In that you can get the Heisenberg principle as a special case of the entropic principle, but not the other way around.

Also, entropy is a better measure of uncertainty, if you think of uncertainty as how many square meters you have to search rather than within what meter radius you have to look.
 
  • Like
Likes chitranshgtm
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top