Rewriting the Ampere's law in term of free currents only

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the need to rewrite Ampere's law in terms of free currents to solve a homework problem involving the magnetic field inside a toroidal magnet. The user is struggling to find the proof for this rewritten form of Ampere's law, which is necessary for their assignment. They reference a specific MIT lecture note for guidance but express confusion about the application of the law. The clarification provided states that Ampere's law can be expressed as the line integral of H equating to the free current I, with B related to H through a permeability equation. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these relationships to advance in solving the magnetic field problem.
Riemann9471
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Prove that Ampere's law ( ∮ B dl = mu_0 x enclosed current ) can be rewritten in terms of free currents only like this : ∮ (1/mu_r) B dl = mu_0 x free enclosed current where mu_r is the relative permeability of the material.
Relevant Equations
Ampere's law : ∮ B dl = mu_0 x enclosed current
Ampere's law rewritten : ∮ (1/mu_r) B dl = mu_0 x free enclosed current
This is not really the assignment of my homework ( my assignment require me to find the magnetic field inside a small air gap on a toroide magnet wrapped with N turns of a wire that carry a current I ) . I'm at some point in the solution where I kind of need to use the rewritten Ampere's law to continue but I can't use it unless I prove it because it has not been proven in class. I couldn't find the proof anywhere so I was hoping to find a little help here !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can work through this:

https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-022-physics-ii-electricity-and-magnetism-fall-2006/lecture-notes/lecture29.pdf
 
Not sure what the problem is here, but

Ampere's law is actually ## \oint \vec H \cdot d \vec l = I ##
and B relates to H by ## B = \mu H = \mu_0 \mu_r H ##
so there you go. I think.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top