Reynolds Transport Theorem Notational Issue

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
Perhaps someone can clear up some confusion for me. EQs (1) and (2) are synonymous, but use different notations for the derivative.

In my textbook, the RTT is written in the following form:

Given some fluid property 'B,' let \beta be the intensive property \beta = d\, B/d\, m. Then the rate of change of B of the system can be written in terms of a control volume:

\frac{d}{dt}(B_{sys}) = \frac{d}{dt}(\int_{cv}\beta\rho\,dV) + \int_{cs}\beta\rho(\mathbf{v}\cdot\mathbf{n})\, dA \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,(1)But, I have seen it elsewhere using partials on the RHS and material derivative on the LHS:

\frac{D}{Dt}(B_{sys}) = \frac{\partial}{\partial{t}}(\int_{cv}\beta\rho\,dV) + \int_{cs}\beta\rho(\mathbf{v}\cdot\mathbf{n})\, dA\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,(2)So my questions are :

i.) Comparing the left-hand-sides of (1) and (2) I presume that d/dt \equiv D/Dt ?

ii.) Why are we using partials, \partial/\partial{t}, in (2) and not in (1) ?

iii.) With regard to the material derivative, what is it exactly? Am I correct in saying that with respect to fluid motion, EQs (1) and (2) tell us about the change in a fluid property 'B' as we follow the system upstream?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have reformulated my question in attempt to attract some responses. I hope my questions are now clear and concise.

Any ideas are welcome :smile:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top