Ricci tensor equals a constant times the metric

Pacopag
Messages
193
Reaction score
4
Hello;
What does it mean physically if I have?
R_{a b} = Ag_{a b}

I think it means that my manifold is an n-sphere (i.e. if A is positive),
or it is AdSn (i.e. if A is negative). Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I got it. What I wrote above is correct for some particular values of A;
n(n-1) \over r^2 where r is the radius of the n-sphere.
Put a minus sign in front of this for AdSn
 
Pacopag said:
I think I got it. What I wrote above is correct for some particular values of A;
n(n-1) \over r^2 where r is the radius of the n-sphere.
Put a minus sign in front of this for AdSn

Are you sure?

I thought that the equations were the following.

For maximally symmetric spaces, we have (n= number os spacetime dimensions)

R_{\rho \sigma \mu \nu} = C (g_{\rho \mu} g_{\sigma \nu} - g_{\rho \nu} g_{\sigma \mu})<br />

By contracting, you can show that

C = \frac{R}{n(n-1)}
whre R is the Ricci scalar.
Therefore

<br /> R_{\rho \sigma \mu \nu} = \frac{R}{n(n-1)} (g_{\rho \mu} g_{\sigma \nu} - g_{\rho \nu} g_{\sigma \mu})


Thsi agrees with eq 3.191 of Carroll

Now, this means

R_{\sigma \nu} = \frac{R}{n} g_{\sigma \nu}
 
To be honest, I don't really know what I'm talking about. But everything you wrote seems correct. But now when I find R for an n-sphere of radius r I find that
R={n(n-1)\over r^2}. So we get
R_{a b}={n-1\over r^2}g_{a b}
Oh wait! That's not what I had above. I had an extra factor of n on the right-hand side.

Thank you kdv
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top