Ricci tensor for electromagnetic field

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the traceless nature of the stress-energy tensor for electromagnetic fields and the implications for the Ricci scalar in the context of general relativity. Participants explore theoretical aspects, mathematical formulations, and the physical significance of these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a traceless stress-energy tensor necessarily implies that the Ricci scalar is zero, seeking proof for this relationship.
  • Another participant asserts that the relationship holds true, providing a mathematical derivation based on the Einstein field equations (EFE), while noting that this assumes the absence of a cosmological constant.
  • A subsequent post reiterates the mathematical derivation provided earlier and seeks clarification on the physical meaning of a traceless Ricci scalar or stress-energy tensor, specifically in relation to electromagnetic fields.
  • A participant shares a link to additional information regarding traceless energy-momentum tensors, suggesting further reading on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of a traceless stress-energy tensor for the Ricci scalar, with some asserting a direct relationship while others seek clarification and further understanding. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications and meanings of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the absence of a cosmological constant and does not resolve the implications of these assumptions on the broader context of general relativity.

ngkamsengpeter
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
Electromagnetic fields mostly have a stress-energy tensor in which the trace is zero. Is traceless stress energy tensor always implies Ricci scalar is zero? If yes how to prove that?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Just contract the EFE's:

[itex]g^{\mu \nu }R_{\mu \nu}-\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu \nu }g_{\mu \nu }R=\kappa g^{\mu \nu } T_{\mu \nu }[/itex]

[itex]R^\mu_{~\mu}-\frac{1}{2}\delta^{\mu}_{~\mu} R=\kappa T^{\mu}_{~\mu}[/itex]

[itex]R=- \kappa T^{\mu}_{~\mu}[/itex]EDIT: I probably should have said yes, assuming no cosmological constant.
 
Last edited:
elfmotat said:
Yes. Just contract the EFE's:

[itex]g^{\mu \nu }R_{\mu \nu}-\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu \nu }g_{\mu \nu }R=\kappa g^{\mu \nu } T_{\mu \nu }[/itex]

[itex]R^\mu_{~\mu}-\frac{1}{2}\delta^{\mu}_{~\mu} R=\kappa T^{\mu}_{~\mu}[/itex]

[itex]R=- \kappa T^{\mu}_{~\mu}[/itex]


EDIT: I probably should have said yes, assuming no cosmological constant.

Ok. Thanks. What is the physical meaning of traceless Ricci scalar or stress energy tensor? Why would the electromagnetic field have a traceless stress energy tensor?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
924
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K