Riddle in a mono-alphabetic code

  • Thread starter Thread starter wubie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Code Riddle
AI Thread Summary
The riddle involves a small circus with a total of 50 feet and 18 heads among horses, riders, and jungle animals. The decoded solution suggests there are 7 horses and 11 riders, but the calculation for jungle animals leads to confusion, potentially resulting in a negative number. The discussion highlights different approaches to solving the riddle, including counting heads and considering the types of animals involved. The mention of an "unwarranted assumption" hints at the need to reassess the problem's parameters, particularly regarding the types of animals included. The conversation concludes with a light-hearted acknowledgment of the complexity and absurdity of the scenario.
wubie
Hello,

I have been given a question which consists of a riddle in a mono-alphabetic code - it is a question that is part of our crytography section. Now I have decoded the riddle. But I am not sure if I have solved the riddle.

Here is the riddle I decoded:

A small circus has a certain number of horses and riders. Between them there are 50 fet and 18 heads. In addition, the circus has some jungle animals that have, altogether, 11 heads and feet. There are twice as many four-footed jungle animals as there are two-footed jungle animals. How many horses, riders, and jungle animals are in the circus?

You should have little difficulty determining that there are 7 horses and 11 riders. But when you try to solve for the number of jungle animals, you may be surprised to find that you encounter a negative number. Solve the problem by ridding yourself of an unwarrented assumption.


Now I didn't have to try hard to figure out a solution:

One way to solve this question was just to count the number of heads. Since there are 11 heads, there must be 11 jungle animals. Therefore there are 7 horses, 11 riders, and 11 jungle animals.

Another way was to say that there are 7 horses, 11 riders, 2 four-footed jungle animals, 1 two-footed animal, and an animal with no legs (Is that the unwarranted assumption? I don't know.)

I can't think of any animals with no legs though. A snake perhaps? Or is a reptile considered an animal? A whale? I recall that whales are mammals. Would a mammal be considered an animal? And if it is a whale, what the heck would a whale be doing in a circus much less a small circus.

Any way, comments on my solution would be appreciated.

Cheers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yesss, sssnakess are animalss!
 
You're spending way too much time in this forum Hurkyl. I think its time for a break.



Cheers.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top