Riemann's Integrability Condition

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Here is a link to the proof I am reading: https://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~hunter/m125b/ch1.pdf

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



The proof to which I am referring can be found on pages 8-9. At the top of page 9, the author makes an assertion which I endeavored to account for, but have been unsuccessful. Here is the assertion:

$$0 \le U(f) - L(f) \le U(f,P - L(f;P) < \epsilon$$

Specifically, I am referring to $$U(f) - L(f) \ge 0$$. Is this really true; how do they know it will always be zero or positive? I have tried to justify it, but have failed. Could someone possibly help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Am I misunderstanding, or did you happen to oversee proposition 1.13 and its proof, just above section 1.4?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top