Rigging Restraints & Force Required to Restrain an object

  • Thread starter Thread starter glocki35
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
AI Thread Summary
To determine the restraint needed to prevent a 6.09 m tall object weighing 496 kg from toppling, it's essential to calculate the potential energy required to tip it, which is 3843.95 Joules. The object is supported by four outriggers, with a wheelbase of 1.58 m and a width of 1.35 m. Consideration of dynamic forces is crucial; for instance, if the object is transported on a truck, factors like acceleration and braking must be accounted for using F=ma. A recommendation suggests securing the object at all four corners with ratchet straps, while also considering the need for additional straps to handle dynamic forces. This approach will ensure the object remains stable under various conditions.
glocki35
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

If I have an object (see drawing in attachment), of 6.09 m in height and a distance to C of G = 0.79 m, how can I work out what restraint would be required to stop this object from toppling over if enough force was placed on the structure to make it topple? (assuming a flat surface)

The weight of this object is 496 Kgs and is supported by x 4 ‘outriggers’ to support the structure, I have worked out the potential energy (or work required to tip the object on a flat surface)of this to be 3843.95 Joules or n/m.

Distance between outriggers is 1.58 m across ‘wheelbase’, it is 1.35 m across the width of the structure

My aim is to make a recommendation on a suitable figure for a restraint method, best case scenario would be to secure this object at all 4 corners or ‘outriggers’, with something like a ratchet strap…

This is part of a larger problem I have been working on (THANKS NVN), this is the last part to solve of this problem, I am a little stuck!

Thanks kindly for your assistance.

Glocki 35
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
You also have to consider why it would topple over.
Simply working out the minimum force needed to over the minimum distance to provide the energy to topple it doesn't really apply if you put this on a truck and do 2g worth of braking - or go round a bend at 55mph.

If it's going to be moving think of the maximum acceleration - then use F=ma to get the force, then double that, then apply that to each strap, then double the number of straps!
 
Thanks mg_phys, i will do that, much appreciated :)
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top