Rigid Bodies and rotatational motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a static equilibrium problem involving a sign and a rod, where the tension in a support cable needs to be calculated. The sign weighs 400 N and is suspended at the end of a 4.00 m rod weighing 500 N, with the cable making a 40-degree angle with the rod. Participants emphasize the importance of considering torque in the problem, specifically calculating clockwise and counterclockwise torques around the point where the rod connects to the wall. The correct setup involves analyzing vertical forces and torque to find the tension in the cable. Ultimately, the solution requires equating the torques to solve for the unknown tension.
in10sivkid
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
yea...i'm having trouble today with my HW lol

a sign weighing 400 N is suspended at the end of a uniform rod 4.00 m weighing 500 N. what is the tension in the support cable if it makes an angle 40 with the rod?

now I'm curious i don't think Tclockwise = Tcounterclockwise comes into play

so i thought of this as a typical static equilibrium problem, but there is only 1 unknown that is the T in the cable that needs to be broken up into a vector

so exactly how does this get setup then

sum of Fx = Cos40F1 = 500 N + 500 N?
sum of Fy = Sin40F1 = 500 N + 400 N?

i know i am missing something
 
Physics news on Phys.org
help please?
 
in10sivkid said:
yea...i'm having trouble today with my HW lol

a sign weighing 400 N is suspended at the end of a uniform rod 4.00 m weighing 500 N. what is the tension in the support cable if it makes an angle 40 with the rod?

now I'm curious i don't think Tclockwise = Tcounterclockwise comes into play

so i thought of this as a typical static equilibrium problem, but there is only 1 unknown that is the T in the cable that needs to be broken up into a vector

so exactly how does this get setup then

sum of Fx = Cos40F1 = 500 N + 500 N?
sum of Fy = Sin40F1 = 500 N + 400 N?

i know i am missing something

Torque does come into play in this problem. There are forces acting where the rod is connected to the wall that are unkown in addition to the tension being unknown. Draw a free body diagram for the rod.
 
Last edited:
so curious would the summation of the forces in the y direction be

Sin40T + F1 (force rod is connected to the wall) = 400 N + 500 N
and but then the sum of the torque is getting me mixed up

if i choose the point where the rod is connected to the wall as the axis of rotation do I include Sin40T as well?


...also I'm having a hard time figuring out exactly how to setup the Torque if i do that...some help would be great
 
in10sivkid said:
so curious would the summation of the forces in the y direction be

Sin40T + F1 (force rod is connected to the wall) = 400 N + 500 N
and but then the sum of the torque is getting me mixed up

if i choose the point where the rod is connected to the wall as the axis of rotation do I include Sin40T as well?


...also I'm having a hard time figuring out exactly how to setup the Torque if i do that...some help would be great

Forget what I said (and deleted) about not needing the torque. It would apply only to a massless rod. Your equation for the vertical forces is correct. Choosing the point of contact of the rod and wall for the axis of rotation leaves you with three forces to consider for the torque calculation. This is the only equation you need. You would need the equation you wrote if you wanted to find the force the wall applies to the rod.

Calculate two clockwise torques: (1) the 400N sign at distance 4m and (2) the 500N weight of the rod at distance 2m (the center of the rod). Calculate the counterclockwise torque: the vertical component of tension Tsin40 at 4m. Equate the clockwise torques to counterclockwise torque and solve for T.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top