Engineering RL Circuit Power Computation: What Am I Missing in My Solution?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around difficulties in computing real and reactive power in an RL circuit, where the user’s results significantly deviate from expected solutions. The user correctly identifies the equations for real power (P = I^2 R) and reactive power (Q = I^2 X) but struggles with the phasor calculations for currents I1 and I2. They find discrepancies in the real components of the currents, which should be equal according to the solutions, leading to incorrect power computations. The user seeks clarification on whether the issue stems from a mathematical error or if an additional step is required in their calculations. Access to the circuit diagram is also noted as a barrier to receiving help.
peroAlex
Messages
35
Reaction score
4
I'm having some problems understanding why my computation deviates from solutions. I thank in advance to anyone who can give me some tips where I've gone wrong.

Homework Statement


Compute real power on resistors ## R_1 ## and ## R_2 ## and reactive power on inductor ## L ##. Circuit is powered by alternating current ## i(t) = 20 sin(\omega t) ## where ## \omega = 400 s^{-1} ##. Here's a link to picture associated with the problem:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByeYlJxPvdrUUUx2RTVFbkF2SFk/view

Homework Equations


I know that real power is computed as $$ P = I^2 R $$ and reactive power as $$ Q = I^2 X $$

The Attempt at a Solution


Part where me and solutions are in phase (pun intended).
Since current distributes, we can write ## \dot{I_T} = \dot{I_1} + \dot{I_2} ##. Those are currents in phasor form. Total current ## \dot{I_T} ## is computed as shown: $$ i(t) = 20 sin(\omega t) = 20 cos(\omega t - \frac{\pi}{2}) \\ \text{phasor becomes } \dot{I_T} = -20j$$ Since voltage must be equal on both branches, we can write ## R_1 \dot{I_1} = (R_2 + j \omega L) \dot{I_2} ## and so solving this simple system of two equations yields $$ \dot{I_1} = \frac{16 \Omega + j 12\Omega}{36 \Omega + j 12 \Omega} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \dot{I_2} = \frac{20 \Omega}{36 \Omega + j 12 \Omega}$$

From here on, my path separates from solutions.
It might be a mathematical mistake for which I'm unable to uncover how and where it occurred, but ## \frac{16 \Omega + j 12\Omega}{36 \Omega + j 12 \Omega} \frac{\text{/} \cdot 36 \Omega - j 12 \Omega}{\text{/} \cdot 36 \Omega - j 12 \Omega} ## results in ## \Re(I_1) = 0.3 ## and ## \Im(I_2) = 0.1 ##. Vice versa, ## \frac{20 \Omega}{36 \Omega + j 12 \Omega} \frac{\text{/} \cdot 36 \Omega - j 12 \Omega}{\text{/} \cdot 36 \Omega - j 12 \Omega} ## should mean that ## \Re(I_2) = 0.5 ## and ## \Im(I_2) = 0.166 ##.

However, according to solutions, both currents have equal real component ## I_1 = I_2 \approx 10.54 A ##.

From here on, power computation takes turn to the worse, since my results yield ## P_1 = \frac{1}{2} R_1 \Re(I_1)^2 = 0.9 W ##, ## P_2 = 2 W ## and ## Q = \frac{1}{2} \omega L \Re(I_2)^2 = 1.5 W ## when reality it should be $$ P_1 \approx 1111.11 W \\ P_2 \approx 888.88 W \\ Q \approx 666.66 V A $$

As said above, I would like to ask for some help on that one. Is it mathematical fault or am I missing an additional step? I am grateful for any help/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please upload your image so that members don't have to go off-site to see it. Right now the image is not accessible to the public (site says "You need permission").
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Back
Top