RNA Interference & SIR2 & SCH9 Genes

  • Thread starter Thread starter bioquest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference Rna
AI Thread Summary
RNA interference (RNAi) is being considered as a method to inhibit the expression of the SIR2 and SCH9 genes. The discussion highlights the uncertainty surrounding the effectiveness of RNAi for this purpose. Additionally, there is a suggestion that providing more background information and relevant resources could enhance the quality of responses to specific inquiries. The conversation also raises the question of why RNA interference might be preferred over gene deletion, hinting at potential advantages such as targeted regulation without permanent genetic alterations.
bioquest
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
Can RNA interference be used to stop the expression of SIR2 and SCH9 genes? Is it unknown whether or not it can?

never mind about the 3rd question found out the only difference was whether or not the change is inherited
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
Hi Bioquest. I've noticed you've been making a lot of posts with very specific, fairly obscure questions. Perhaps you'd get a better response if you gave people more back ground information. A link to a website containing pertinent information would be especially helpful.
 
Why use RNA interference instead of deleting a gene? What could/would make that more beneficial?
 
Last edited:

Thread 'Chagas disease now established in US'

Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
View full post »

Thread 'I need help understanding this quote about recent Natural Selection'

I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
View full post »

Similar threads

RNA Evolves to an Ecosystem of Hosts & Parasites
Replies
2
Views
3K
What happens to a protein built from mutated RNA?
Replies
9
Views
5K
Number of genes and their repressors
Replies
11
Views
2K
COVID Precisely how does Pfizer's Covid-19 mRNA vaccine work?
Replies
31
Views
6K
Why Apes and Humans don't have Tails
Replies
8
Views
3K
Biological Info: Understanding & Analyzing
Replies
15
Views
3K
I need help understanding this quote about recent Natural Selection
Replies
20
Views
205
Emery-Dreifuss Muscular Dystrophy
Replies
1
Views
982
Alzheimer’s May Involve Modified Genes in Brain Cells
Replies
1
Views
2K
What are housekeeping and constitutive genes?
Replies
4
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top