Road Vehicle Drag: Researching Relationship, Design & Performance

  • Thread starter Thread starter natalieng
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag Vehicle
AI Thread Summary
Research on road vehicle drag focuses on the relationship between drag and turbulence, as well as how engineers design vehicles to optimize aerodynamics and performance. Key areas of interest include the types of drag—parasitic, form, skin friction, and interference drag. Aesthetic considerations also play a role in aerodynamic design, influencing both performance and visual appeal. Users recommend starting with resources like Wikipedia for foundational knowledge. The urgency of completing the report by Friday adds pressure to select relevant information efficiently.
natalieng
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi

i'm writting a report on road vehicle drag.

Are there any free resources online / journals that i can use for research?

my questions:

Relationship between Drag and Turbulence
what does a engineer design in a car? (engines, the body-aerodynamics..)
and the relationship between aesthetics and aerodynamic drag performance.


Any help wouuld be much appreciated!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

You'll need to do the heavy lifting on this. But perhaps Wikipedia would be a generally good place to start?

More specifically:
Types of drag are generally divided into the following categories:
parasitic drag, consisting of
o form drag,
o skin friction,
o interference drag,​
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_(physics )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
LowlyPion said:
Welcome to PF.

You'll need to do the heavy lifting on this. But perhaps Wikipedia would be a generally good place to start?

More specifically:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_(physics )



Thanks LowlyPion!
it's a lot of work! because its not a very extensive report, probably up till about 5pgs , size12 font, so got to select what's important! and limited time! lol ! due this friday! ARGH
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi Natalieng,
Im writing a similar kind of report and i would like to know if you wouldn't mind posting yours online so that i could have a look at it.
Thanks :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top