Robotics doesn't seem very useful as a major , agree or disagree

  • Thread starter Thread starter land_of_ice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Major Robotics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the perceived utility of majoring in robotics compared to traditional engineering fields such as mechanical or electrical engineering. Participants explore the necessity of humanoid forms in robotics and the broader applications of robotic technology in various industries.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that robotics does not need to resemble human forms to be useful, suggesting that traditional engineering disciplines may be more practical.
  • Others highlight the effectiveness of industrial robots, which typically do not have humanoid shapes but are designed for specific tasks.
  • A participant mentions that the term 'robot' originates from a word meaning 'slave worker', emphasizing that functionality is more important than form.
  • One contributor shares their experience with unmanned stacker cranes, suggesting that humanoid robots may have limited usefulness compared to robots designed for specific tasks that humans cannot perform.
  • Another participant suggests exploring fields like controls and mechatronics, indicating that robotics is a significant area within electrical and mechanical engineering that is unlikely to diminish in importance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of humanoid forms in robotics, with some asserting that functionality is paramount while others question the relevance of robotics as a major compared to traditional engineering disciplines. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall utility of majoring in robotics.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific applications and examples of robotics, but there is no consensus on the necessity of humanoid designs or the comparative value of robotics as a field of study.

land_of_ice
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
a circuitry design does not really have to be similar to human form (i.e. a robotic like thing) in order to be useful.

So majoring in robotics does not seem that important? Just plain engineering (mechanical or electrical) is just as useful if not more.

agree or disagree?

also if you read the book "build your own humanoid robot" by Karl Williams , it makes sense that an application does not need to look human to perform a particular function? or to be useful?

can anyone give an examples of when it absolutely has to resemble a humanoid form to be useful?

other than frivolous things like a human like robot carrying a tray to your room just like on the Jetsons, which again would not be necessary, it would be able to carry the tray to the room without looking humanoid just fine.

another example would be this robot in Asia teaching students in a class room, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technolo...her-conducts-first-class-in-Tokyo-school.html but again it doesn't need to look human to serve it's purpose, so how is robotics useful?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Why do you think a robot has to look like a human?

Industrial robots are very common and useful. Generally they simply consist of an arm which is fitted with an "end effector" to perform a specific task.
 
Integral said:
Why do you think a robot has to look like a human?

Industrial robots are very common and useful. Generally they simply consist of an arm which is fitted with an "end effector" to perform a specific task.

So robotic just means that it moves, not that it looks humanoid?
 
'Robot' is a word which comes from the Polish, meaning 'Slave worker', I believe.
There is no need for it to be an Android - just to perform some task.
Making your average robot, an Android would be to introduce pointless complexity and cost.
 
I used to program unmanned stacker cranes. These were cranes that received a command from another computer to store or retrieve a pallet of material at or from a specified location in a warehouse. Some people called those cranes robots.

It seems to me that a robot in human form would have limited usefulness because it would be duplicating what humans already do. The advantage of robots is to be able to do things humans can't do and it seems to me many times that requires a different size or shape.
 
You might want to look into "controls" and/or "mechatronics", the subject of robotics gets talked about is lots of EE and ME courses and is a big field that is not likely go to away. If you know some PLC programming, control theory, and some other ME stuff there are TONS of companies that do automation for industrial applications and other stuff that you could work for. If you really want to get into the humanoid robotics you can get a masters or PHD and go into research on these types of areas, I don't know the name of it but there is a whole field dedicated to human like robots. I would suggest you start, however, with choosing between ME and EE (you can do both but that is a TON of work and will take more years in school at most places), once you figure that out you usually have 2 years before you have to choose a specialty and can use that time to get more familiar with what is out there. Good luck!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K