Rock off cliff - calculate height by using speed of sound

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the height of the cliff, the total time of 8.5 seconds includes both the time it takes for the rock to fall and the time for the sound to travel back up. The rock's fall time (t1) is less than 8.5 seconds, with the remaining time (8.5 - t1) allocated for the sound to travel back to the top. By applying the equations of motion and the speed of sound, the height can be determined. The discussion clarifies the confusion around the timing of the rock's fall and the sound's travel. Ultimately, the problem is solvable with the right understanding of the time components involved.
Bikengine
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
You are climbing in the High Sierra where you suddenly find yourself at the edge of a fog-shrouded cliff. To find the height of this cliff, you drop a rock from the top and 8.50s later hear the sound of it hitting the ground at the foot of the cliff.

Ignoring air resistance, how high is the cliff if the speed of sound is 330 m/s?

v = u + at
s = ut + 1/2at^2
d = st



I am confused because the rock takes 8.5 secs to fall, and I can't figure out how to determine at what point in those 8.5 seconds the rock hits the bottom, and the sound of it starts traveling up to the top of the cliff
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bikengine said:
I am confused because the rock takes 8.5 secs to fall, and I can't figure out how to determine at what point in those 8.5 seconds the rock hits the bottom, and the sound of it starts traveling up to the top of the cliff
The 8.5 s refers to the time that you hear the rock hit the bottom. So the time for the rock to hit the bottom, t1, is less than 8.5s and the remaining (8.5 - t1)s is the time for the sound of the rock hitting the bottom (or echo) to reach you.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I have the answer now, thanks very much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top