Rocket launching - Newton's Second Law

AI Thread Summary
During a rocket launch, an astronaut measures a weight of 3.6 times her normal weight, prompting a calculation of the rocket's acceleration. The relevant equations include Fnet = ma and the relationship between normal force (N) and gravitational force (Fg). The astronaut's weight measurement indicates that N equals 3.6mg, leading to the equation 3.6mg - mg = ma, allowing for the mass to cancel out. Clarification was needed on why the factor of 3.6 applies to N rather than Fg, which was resolved through discussion. Understanding the correct application of these forces is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
dandy9
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that during the launch of a rocket from the surface of the earth, an astronaut onboard the rocket stands on a bathroom scale and measures her weight to be 3.6 times her normal weight. Determine the acceleration of the rocket.

Homework Equations


Fnet \sumF = ma

or maybe involving Tension?
Fnet \sumF = T - Fg = ma

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried the second equation but can't get anywhere. I ended up with T - 35 = a.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your T should be the normal reaction N. So you have N-mg=ma. They told you that N=3.6mg, so that the m will cancel out.
 
Thanks for the reply.

Sorry, but I don't see how the "m"'s cancel out...
If T = 3.6mg then I would have the equation:
35m-35=a
I'm still struggling with getting the mass.
 
dandy9 said:
Thanks for the reply.

Sorry, but I don't see how the "m"'s cancel out...
If T = 3.6mg then I would have the equation:
35m-35=a
I'm still struggling with getting the mass.

No, you'll have:

N-Fg=Fnet

3.6mg-mg=ma. Then you can divide by m so they all cancel. I don't know how you canceled your m's before, and I especially don't know you have a 35 in there.
 
Thanks I got it now!

Before, I canceled my "m"'s too early, before I knew that T was N, so when I put in 3.6mg, I was left with that m and didn't know what to do with it.

As for the 35, I used the 3.6 in the wrong way - I used it with Fg because the question stated that the astronaut is 3.6 times her normal weight. Perhaps if you have the time to quickly explain to me why the 3.6 goes with N instead of Fg I would very much appreciate it.

Thank you again!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top