Rocket Acceleration in a Uniform Gravitational Field: Analyzing Momentum Change

AI Thread Summary
A rocket accelerating upwards in a uniform gravitational field experiences momentum changes that can be expressed as mdv/dt = kv(ext) - mg, where m is the mass of the rocket, g is gravitational acceleration, and k is the fuel consumption rate. The discussion highlights the derivation of this equation and emphasizes the need to isolate dv for integration to find the speed v as a function of remaining mass m. It is noted that if k is very large, the results align with previous class findings that disregard gravity. Participants are encouraged to assume constant exhaust velocity for simplification. The conversation centers on the mathematical approach to solving the momentum equation in the context of rocket dynamics.
Gogsey
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
A rocket is accelerating upwards from rest in a uniform gravitational field g. Notation: m(t) is the mass of the rocket plus remaining fuel, m0 is the initial total mass, vex is the exhaust speed (relative to the rocket), and k is the rate, in kg/s, at which fuel is consumed. By considering momentum changes in a short time dt, show that mdv/dt = kv(ext) - mg(upward direction is positive). Assuming k is constant, find the speed v as a function of the
remaining mass m. Show that, if k is very large, it agrees with the result derived in class (without gravity).

Ok, so i have already proved the first part.

P(t)=mv and P(t+dt) = (m+dm)(v+dv)-dM(v-v(ext))

=mv+vdm+dmv(ext)

The a couple of steps later we get: -mgdt=mdv+(ext)(dm/dt)

so we get -mg=mdv/dt -kv(ext), where -k=dm/dt

and therefore mdv/dt=kv(ext) - mg.

Ok, so I'm a little stuck on the second part. Not really sure where to start off. Any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming that k=dm/dt is constant isolate dv then integrate. You have to assume the exhaust velocity, v(ext) is constant.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top