Have the following question and just wondering if my solution is correct(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Let g(x)= x^5+3x-1. Show that there are no distinct points x_1, x_2 in R such that g(x_1)=g(x_2).

Proof by contradiction. Assume we have two solution x_1<x_2 in ℝ, i,e g(x_1)+g(x_2)=0, since g is differentiable on (x_1,x_2) and continuous on [x_1,x_2], then we can apply rolles theorem, there exits a C belonging to (x_1, x_2) such that df/dx=0, however df/dx=5x^4+3>0 Hence we have a contradiction and only one solution to f(x)=0.

Many thanks in advance.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Rolles Theorem, showing two distinct points.

Loading...

Similar Threads - Rolles Theorem showing | Date |
---|---|

Area under the curve of a roll data of satellite | Feb 27, 2013 |

New proof of rolles theorom | Mar 10, 2012 |

Period of a ball rolling on a cycloid | Dec 17, 2011 |

Needed clarification regarding Rolles theorem | Apr 4, 2011 |

Rolle's Theorem | Jul 29, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**