Rolling ball distance Math problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a math problem involving a ball rolling down an inclined plane, represented by the equation y = 0.165x^2 + 0.997x + 0.845, where y is distance in meters and x is time in seconds. The user seeks to predict the distance rolled in two days and inquires about necessary assumptions and the model's strengths and limitations. Key limitations include the model's inability to account for terminal velocity, as it assumes continuous acceleration. Additional questions arise regarding the choice of a quadratic fit and the underlying physics that could provide context for the coefficients in the equation. The conversation highlights the intersection of math and physics in modeling real-world scenarios.
i_need_help
I have this math problem for school that I need help with

A ball is rolling down an inclined plane. The equation I have is y = .165x^2 + .997x + .845 where y is the distance traveled and x is the time taken

I want to predict the distance it has rolled in 2 days, which I can do

but what sort of assumptions would i have to make?

and what are the strengths and limitations for the model?
for example, a limitation is that when it reaches terminal velocity the model won't work anymore because the model expects the speed to keep increasing

i don't know anything about physics so i need help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to provide information about your starting equation. You state that x is time, is it seconds, hours, or days? It makes a difference. Can you tell us where your equation came from?
 
x is time in seconds

y is distance in metres

the equation came from the data i got from rolling the ball down the slope. i recorded it using a motion sensor, then i came up with a line of best fit for the data. that's my equation
 
i_need_help said:
I have this math problem for school that I need help with

A ball is rolling down an inclined plane. The equation I have is y = .165x^2 + .997x + .845 where y is the distance traveled and x is the time taken

I want to predict the distance it has rolled in 2 days, which I can do

but what sort of assumptions would i have to make?

and what are the strengths and limitations for the model?
for example, a limitation is that when it reaches terminal velocity the model won't work anymore because the model expects the speed to keep increasing

i don't know anything about physics so i need help

i_need_help said:
x is time in seconds

y is distance in metres

the equation came from the data i got from rolling the ball down the slope. i recorded it using a motion sensor, then i came up with a line of best fit for the data. that's my equation
Why did you post this in the math section (and title it "Math Problem)? None of those question have any thing to do with mathematics (you did the math part when you derived that equation), they have to do with physics.

I'm going to move this thread to physics homework.
 
thank you. i titled it math problem because its for a math assignment...i don't even do physics

but it sort of is more like physics
 
Some more questions:
Why did you choose to fit to a quadratic?
How good was your fit?

What physics can do for you is predict the values of, and give meaning to your coefficients. I am surprised that you would be given this problem without the underling physical model.

As far as assumptions go, there is an obvious one concerning length of the ramp required to roll for 2 days.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top